Re: Questions on HDLC MIB
Fred Baker <fbaker@acc.com> Mon, 20 January 1992 18:39 UTC
Received: from nri.reston.va.us by NRI.NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa26563; 20 Jan 92 13:39 EST
Received: from dg-rtp.rtp.dg.com by NRI.NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa26558; 20 Jan 92 13:39 EST
Received: from SAFFRON.ACC.COM by dg-rtp.dg.com (5.4/dg-rtp-proto) id AA02949; Mon, 20 Jan 1992 13:18:55 -0500
Received: by saffron.acc.com (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA08004; Mon, 20 Jan 92 10:10:35 PST
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 1992 10:10:35 -0800
From: Fred Baker <fbaker@acc.com>
Message-Id: <9201201810.AA08004@saffron.acc.com>
To: markt@python.eng.microcom.com
Subject: Re: Questions on HDLC MIB
Cc: x25mib@dg-rtp.dg.com
>> I also agree that the "nearest analog" solution is a good >> compromise. But, in a case where no approximation can be made, >> returning zero for an error counter is misleading. What is your preferred solution? Fred
- Re: Questions on HDLC MIB Fred Baker
- Re: Questions on HDLC MIB Mark Therieau