Protocol Action: SNMP MIB extension for MultiProtocol Interconnect over X.25 to Proposed Standard

IESG Secretary <iesg-secretary@CNRI.Reston.VA.US> Thu, 20 May 1993 17:34 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa08634; 20 May 93 13:34 EDT
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa08630; 20 May 93 13:34 EDT
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa15904; 20 May 93 13:34 EDT
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa08605; 20 May 93 13:34 EDT
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa08601; 20 May 93 13:34 EDT
To: IETF-Announce: ;
Cc: Jon Postel -- RFC Editor <postel@isi.edu>
Cc: Internet Architecture Board <iab@isi.edu>
Cc: x25mib@dg-rtp.dg.com
Cc: The Internet Engineering Steering Group <IESG@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US>
X-Orig-Sender: iesg-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: IESG Secretary <iesg-secretary@CNRI.Reston.VA.US>
Subject: Protocol Action: SNMP MIB extension for MultiProtocol Interconnect over X.25 to Proposed Standard
Date: Thu, 20 May 93 13:34:04 -0400
X-Orig-Sender: gvaudre@CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Message-ID: <9305201334.aa08601@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US>

  The IESG has approved the Internet Draft "SNMP MIB extension for
  MultiProtocol Interconnect over X.25"
  <draft-ietf-x25mib-ipox25mib-05.txt> as a Proposed Standard. This
  document is the product of the X.25 Management Information Base
  Working Group. The IESG contact person is Marshall Rose.

Technical Summary

  The Multiprotocol Interconnect over X.25 MIB defines objects that
  allow SNMP to manage the encapsulation of IP (and other link level
  protocols) on X.25 as specified in RFC 1356.  These objects
  complement the objects in the "SNMP MIB extension for the Packet
  Layer of X.25", the "SNMP MIB extension for LAPB", and the
  "Definitions of Managed Objects for RS-232-like Hardware Devices", to
  allow management of RFC 1356 traffic over the entire X.25 protocol
  stack.

Working Group Summary

  There were no outstanding issues or controversies in the working
  group.

Protocol Quality

  The document has been reviewed by the NM Area Director, which
  resulted in some (minor) changes.  There are no implementations at
  present.

Note to RFC Editor

  Prior to RFC publication, please remove Section 1.1 (Revision
  History), as this relates information about the Internet-Drafts which
  preceeded this document.