Re: [XCON] Membership Manipulation: Need for Discussion

I would like to re propose CPCP. It is myself and Aki that are the 
authors. I dont think its fair that someone else's withdrawal is 
appropriate.

Thanks,
Hisham

On Aug 9, 2005, at 12:28 AM, Adam Roach wrote:

> [as chair]
>
> In Paris, one of the clearly identified issues that needs to be closed 
> before we can make significant progress was settling on a protocol for 
> conference membership manipulation (and related operations).
>
> With Rohan withdrawing CPCP and Henning withdrawing Netconf as 
> proposals, we are left with three proposals on the table:
>
>    * CCCP (draft-levin-xcon-cccp-02)
>    * CSCP (draft-jennings-xcon-cscp-01)
>    * "Something SOAP Based" (no draft proposal)
>
>
> I would urge proponents of a SOAP-based proposal to create a draft 
> discussing their approach as quickly as possible, since comparisons of 
> approaches are otherwise very difficult.
>
> It would benefit the group greatly if we now had some discussion 
> around these various protocols; this email is intended as a call for 
> participation in that discussion. Any work that participants feel 
> would be useful in helping with this decision -- such as strawman data 
> models -- would also be welcome.
>
> /a
>
> _______________________________________________
> XCON mailing list
> XCON@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xcon
>

_______________________________________________
XCON mailing list
XCON@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xcon