Re: Internet draft for sbml+xml media type
Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org> Thu, 09 October 2003 19:05 UTC
Received: from above.proper.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by above.proper.com (8.12.9/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h99J5MKP081280 for <ietf-xml-mime-bks@above.proper.com>; Thu, 9 Oct 2003 12:05:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-ietf-xml-mime@mail.imc.org)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by above.proper.com (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h99J5LKs081279 for ietf-xml-mime-bks; Thu, 9 Oct 2003 12:05:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: above.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-xml-mime@mail.imc.org using -f
Received: from homer.w3.org (homer.w3.org [18.29.0.30]) by above.proper.com (8.12.9/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h99J59KP081271 for <ietf-xml-mime@imc.org>; Thu, 9 Oct 2003 12:05:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from chris@w3.org)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homer.w3.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 084EA3DA; Thu, 9 Oct 2003 15:04:59 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2003 21:04:57 +0200
From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
X-Mailer: The Bat! (v2.00.6) Personal
Reply-To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
Organization: W3C
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Message-ID: <18718895059.20031009210457@w3.org>
To: Ben Kovitz <bkovitz@caltech.edu>
Cc: ietf-types@iana.org, ietf-xml-mime@imc.org
Subject: Re: Internet draft for sbml+xml media type
In-Reply-To: <1065642124.3f84688c56dd2@webmail.nethere.net>
References: <1065642124.3f84688c56dd2@webmail.nethere.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-ietf-xml-mime@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-xml-mime/mail-archive/>
List-ID: <ietf-xml-mime.imc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-xml-mime-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
On Wednesday, October 8, 2003, 9:42:04 PM, Ben wrote: BK> Hi, I've just submitted an Internet Draft for the sbml+xml media BK> type. I and the other folks responsible for SBML (the Systems BK> Biology Markup Langage) have incorporated the comments and BK> suggestions from the folks on this list, especially getting a BK> definite, persistent, named organization in place to serve as BK> the change owner. BK> The draft is here: BK> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-sbml-media-type-00.txt BK> Your comments are solicited. Do the existing SBML-consuming tools honor the charset parameter when SBML is sent over HTTP or email? And where the charset parameter disagrees with the encoding in the XMl encoding declaration, do these tools rewrite the XML when saving it to disk? Note that, although charset is optional in this registration, RFC 3023 still imposes requirements on software in the *absence* of a charset. If not, I suggest removing this optional parameter as follows: There is no charset parameter. Character handling has identical semantics to the case where the charset parameter of the "application/xml" media type is omitted, as described in [RFC3023]. -- Chris mailto:chris@w3.org
- Re: Internet draft for sbml+xml media type MURATA Makoto
- Re: Internet draft for sbml+xml media type Ben Kovitz
- Re: Internet draft for sbml+xml media type Tim Bray
- Re: Internet draft for sbml+xml media type Ben Kovitz
- Re: Internet draft for sbml+xml media type Ben Kovitz
- Re: Internet draft for sbml+xml media type Chris Lilley
- Internet draft for sbml+xml media type Ben Kovitz