Re: [Xml-sg-cmt] is "example" an acceptable type within <artwork>

Lynne Bartholomew <lbartholomew@amsl.com> Fri, 04 March 2022 02:45 UTC

From: Lynne Bartholomew <lbartholomew@amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2022 18:45:38 -0800
References: <b749b97d-9a78-bf28-50be-baaec9e86e93@greenbytes.de> <C243E539-F02B-48B5-9AFB-DFEBB9914DE6@amsl.com>
To: "xml-sg-cmt@ietf.org" <xml-sg-cmt@ietf.org>, RFC System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
In-Reply-To: <C243E539-F02B-48B5-9AFB-DFEBB9914DE6@amsl.com>
Message-Id: <B79AF33A-DE79-4E04-898E-F4632C4D672C@amsl.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xml-sg-cmt/CsfJfV5dLpZrs6q2i-DkacndPjs>
Subject: Re: [Xml-sg-cmt] is "example" an acceptable type within <artwork>
Precedence: list

Hi, KC and everyone.

Thank you for sending this to <xml-sg-cmt@ietf.org>, KC!  A similar question came up for me as well -- this time for <sourcecode>.

draft-ietf-httpbis-priority-12 has four <sourcecode> entries with type="example" and two with type="drawing", so I asked the authors if they would like to request that type="example" and type="drawing" be added to the list of usable sourcecode types on <https://www.rfc-editor.org/materials/sourcecode-types.txt> (because I was under the impression that if a type isn't explicitly listed as acceptable, it shouldn't be used unless someone decides to add it to the list in question, i.e., <artwork> or <sourcecode>).

In the case of both <artwork> and <sourcecode>, is it OK for authors to use whatever type they deem appropriate for their document, even if the type isn't used or listed anywhere else?

Thanks again.

Lynne

> On Mar 3, 2022, at 5:17 PM, Karen Moore <kmoore@amsl.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi team,
> 
> In RFC-to-be 9112 (which is currently in AUTH48), Julian would like to set the type to “example” within the <artwork> elements (since they are not ascii-art).  Is this acceptable, or do you see any issues with this? There are three instances in the text.
> 
> One example
> 
> Old:
>    <artwork type=“ascii-art"><![CDATA[
>     https://www.example.org/pub/WWW/TheProject.html
>     ]]></artwork>
>           
> New:
>    <artwork type=“example"><![CDATA[
>    https://www.example.org/pub/WWW/TheProject.html
>    ]]></artwork>
> 
> 
> The files are here:
>  https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9112.txt
>  https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9112.pdf
>  https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9112.html
>  https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9112.xml
> 
> Thanks,
> Karen
> 
>> Begin forwarded message:
>> 
>> From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de>
>> Subject: Re: AUTH48 [KC]: RFC 9112 <draft-ietf-httpbis-messaging-19.txt> NOW AVAILABLE
>> Date: March 1, 2022 at 11:47:25 AM PST
>> To: Karen Moore <kmoore@amsl.com>, "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
>> Cc: httpbis-chairs@ietf.org, httpbis-ads@ietf.org, Tommy Pauly <tpauly@apple.com>, "rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org" <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
>> 
>> Am 11.02.2022 um 20:21 schrieb Karen Moore:
>>> ...
>> 
>> Hi Karen,
>> 
>> I found three cases where we have examples in <artwork> elements, and none of these cases are "ascii-art". Please revert (or apply attached XML).
>> 
>> Best regards, Julian
> <rfc9112-to-be.xml>
> 
>

[Xml-sg-cmt] is "example" an acceptable type with… Karen Moore
Re: [Xml-sg-cmt] is "example" an acceptable type … Lynne Bartholomew
Re: [Xml-sg-cmt] is "example" an acceptable type … Sandy Ginoza
Re: [Xml-sg-cmt] is "example" an acceptable type … John R Levine
Re: [Xml-sg-cmt] is "example" an acceptable type … Julian Reschke