Re: [Xml-sg-cmt] index question
Sandy Ginoza <sginoza@amsl.com> Mon, 15 March 2021 19:15 UTC
Return-Path: <sginoza@amsl.com>
X-Original-To: xml-sg-cmt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xml-sg-cmt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D33943A1BA2 for <xml-sg-cmt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Mar 2021 12:15:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ufBRsXtSYslZ for <xml-sg-cmt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Mar 2021 12:15:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.amsl.com (c8a.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C03223A1B9E for <xml-sg-cmt@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Mar 2021 12:15:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2C7B3898AB; Mon, 15 Mar 2021 12:15:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c8a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lLp5ew4-JbrY; Mon, 15 Mar 2021 12:15:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.175] (cpe-172-113-155-155.socal.res.rr.com [172.113.155.155]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 74F2C38989D; Mon, 15 Mar 2021 12:15:20 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
From: Sandy Ginoza <sginoza@amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <78eee233-e431-b672-84a3-03de6ba258f1@nostrum.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2021 12:15:19 -0700
Cc: xml-sg-cmt@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <DCF18A8F-1BBD-40E4-87DC-5680EA0955FD@amsl.com>
References: <7133140B-73BE-4301-8AD8-7A085994AA15@amsl.com> <78eee233-e431-b672-84a3-03de6ba258f1@nostrum.com>
To: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xml-sg-cmt/LDcmkIwb5lJexv4c-eXgRGdurEE>
Subject: Re: [Xml-sg-cmt] index question
X-BeenThere: xml-sg-cmt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working list for the xml and style guide change management team <xml-sg-cmt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xml-sg-cmt>, <mailto:xml-sg-cmt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/xml-sg-cmt/>
List-Post: <mailto:xml-sg-cmt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xml-sg-cmt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xml-sg-cmt>, <mailto:xml-sg-cmt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2021 19:15:24 -0000
Hi Robert, > On Mar 15, 2021, at 12:11 PM, Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> wrote: > > To be clear, you moved 607 (which is, I think, item c below) to critical, not 603. My mistake - I did try to move 603 to critical last week; I must not have saved it correctly. I have done so now. Sorry for the confusion. And correct, 607 was added and marked as critical. Please feel free to update these if critical is the wrong priority. Thanks, Sandy > > On 3/12/21 4:24 PM, Sandy Ginoza wrote: >> Hi team, >> >> draft-ietf-extra-imap4rev2-30, which is currently in our queue, contains an index. As noted in ticket 603, xml2rfc crashes when making the PDF file. Temporarily, we have removed “$” from the <iref>s so we’re able to create the PDF. >> >> https://trac.tools.ietf.org/tools/xml2rfc/trac/ticket/603 >> >> Please note I changed the priority of 603 to critical (it’s not yet a blocker). >> We also see <https://trac.tools.ietf.org/tools/xml2rfc/trac/ticket/418> related to index. >> >> Looking at the index in the output files, we have a few questions/comments. See >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/v3test/test-index-ietf-extra-imap4rev2-30.html#name-index >> >> a) Does the index look as expected? The terms appear twice, once as text and once as a link. >> >> b) In the text, the index is formatted differently. Also, I think the index needs to be present so the content in the various outputs is the same, but the index is essentially useless because there are no links and no page numbers. >> >> c) The index does not appear in the toc; I’ll file a ticket for this. >> >> >> Partially formatted v3 files are here: >> >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/v3test/test-index-ietf-extra-imap4rev2-30.html >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/v3test/test-index-ietf-extra-imap4rev2-30.pdf >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/v3test/test-index-ietf-extra-imap4rev2-30.txt >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/v3test/test-index-ietf-extra-imap4rev2-30.xml >> >> >> Thanks, >> Sandy >> >> > > -- > Xml-sg-cmt mailing list > Xml-sg-cmt@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xml-sg-cmt
- Re: [Xml-sg-cmt] index question Sandy Ginoza
- [Xml-sg-cmt] index question Sandy Ginoza
- Re: [Xml-sg-cmt] index question Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [Xml-sg-cmt] index question Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [Xml-sg-cmt] index question Robert Sparks
- Re: [Xml-sg-cmt] index question Sandy Ginoza
- Re: [Xml-sg-cmt] index question Robert Sparks
- Re: [Xml-sg-cmt] index question Alice Russo