Re: [Xml-sg-cmt] relref element ?
Alice Russo <arusso@amsl.com> Fri, 11 February 2022 19:28 UTC
Return-Path: <arusso@amsl.com>
X-Original-To: xml-sg-cmt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xml-sg-cmt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA3F23A0A0D for <xml-sg-cmt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Feb 2022 11:28:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fwji4f5Lkbvy for <xml-sg-cmt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Feb 2022 11:27:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from c8a.amsl.com (c8a.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95F5E3A0A1E for <xml-sg-cmt@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Feb 2022 11:27:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84E56425C152; Fri, 11 Feb 2022 11:27:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c8a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7M0LsoWpFj8l; Fri, 11 Feb 2022 11:27:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.4.33] (c-24-17-19-210.hsd1.wa.comcast.net [24.17.19.210]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 64E61425A346; Fri, 11 Feb 2022 11:27:58 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
From: Alice Russo <arusso@amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <047113b0-cdb5-d5f9-cb4e-9dcce0aa6606@taugh.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2022 11:27:58 -0800
Cc: "xml-sg-cmt@ietf.org" <xml-sg-cmt@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <E3D40FF6-FCCB-4367-8CB3-8BFB47B27C52@amsl.com>
References: <047113b0-cdb5-d5f9-cb4e-9dcce0aa6606@taugh.com>
To: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xml-sg-cmt/h6NQEqrwPc-xMUIWLxgb-NzSftI>
Subject: Re: [Xml-sg-cmt] relref element ?
X-BeenThere: xml-sg-cmt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working list for the xml and style guide change management team <xml-sg-cmt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xml-sg-cmt>, <mailto:xml-sg-cmt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/xml-sg-cmt/>
List-Post: <mailto:xml-sg-cmt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xml-sg-cmt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xml-sg-cmt>, <mailto:xml-sg-cmt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:28:03 -0000
That seems to have been the conclusion here: https://github.com/rfc-format/draft-iab-xml2rfc-v3-bis/issues/26 And FWIW, deprecating matches the proposal here -- https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-levkowetz-xml2rfc-v3-implementation-notes-13.html#section-4.4.22 Alice > On Feb 11, 2022, at 11:15 AM, John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote: > > Did we agree to deprecate the <relref> element? It's never been used in a published RFC. > > Regards, > John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY > Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly > > -- > Xml-sg-cmt mailing list > Xml-sg-cmt@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xml-sg-cmt >
- [Xml-sg-cmt] relref element ? John R Levine
- Re: [Xml-sg-cmt] relref element ? Alice Russo