IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Xml-sg-cmt] Fwd: [rfc-i] Yet another RFCXMLv3 grammar bug

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@mozilla.com> Fri, 03 December 2021 16:01 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@mozilla.com>
X-Original-To: xml-sg-cmt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xml-sg-cmt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE7DA3A0B82 for <xml-sg-cmt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Dec 2021 08:01:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.951
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.951 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-1.852, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=mozilla.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eWsP4bbbt9yK for <xml-sg-cmt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Dec 2021 08:01:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io1-xd2c.google.com (mail-io1-xd2c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3DAF3A0B80 for <xml-sg-cmt@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Dec 2021 08:01:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io1-xd2c.google.com with SMTP id m9so4392173iop.0 for <xml-sg-cmt@ietf.org>; Fri, 03 Dec 2021 08:01:40 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mozilla.com; s=google; h=message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject:content-language:to :references:from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=c3W8+MvCJu387Hug3lIMSyXROsubLS4CpgCwkLxHgdc=; b=bLrHk6bjZgVGFnANog4uJfie8+haWIges0oeprwN3Bpx4QSTPcnqwe86RoQ5sEnQKs jol77C1K8t2anvNvz/vyJK43529YcW3UF6lq7D1KuN+QuPdCfNA8UcJ+iM4zVumbBukY NGmInrd1nR9MXYLZ/HsxFGKNDyoB8eElStvRI=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=c3W8+MvCJu387Hug3lIMSyXROsubLS4CpgCwkLxHgdc=; b=0p90mq0Wzz65hUHUl7oRn10GMDBl/vU1+IfvbC0YwvUXW5OoVGV2/tmn8k16Dr19hT FkYGq/+cpQ+v7R8nzWAzvgG0QVcnLzQCP9IxMGUAns+IpxqWvlQt0oke6xgza8GC6JTH eRrXuBL7NcuzI1O6Ic+BKT7+/rXkbyUWKysmFyUKknCzhpYo4vNdQp9cb4w5sGQutqdm nrpgkgdXAey0svQHqSuvjZwhrEY7JbaLA7jzeQW/0SBabPbJqFjLmQwu88851/qyPJZz tnFAZFQzLUKVgJJBCESJEX5d0GycVhvXE8scD3MGHPI448oxnURHjPp9/weQumnyU5Wb e/Yw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531duo/9wbTKm8Oi05MtqC6yM/r5wOnkAJkwdXuOY0GHcH4QdTj9 AC6g9fOmAYKwhDgHsu6yjWXDdg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy0lS5lPqpOUfyOcohCNebGZG0o0WzFlUKGZnWNM5aSS2k+YEVMywBf5ZT830HB/Y/JNDAECw==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6638:3795:: with SMTP id w21mr25026156jal.73.1638547298373; Fri, 03 Dec 2021 08:01:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.13] (c-76-25-154-156.hsd1.co.comcast.net. [76.25.154.156]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h1sm2124397iow.31.2021.12.03.08.01.37 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 03 Dec 2021 08:01:37 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <741907f8-563c-cab4-9b0b-687fcbf20b88@mozilla.com>
Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2021 09:01:37 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.3.2
Content-Language: en-US
To: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>, "xml-sg-cmt@ietf.org" <xml-sg-cmt@ietf.org>
References: <577B911E-D367-40FC-A276-92A060C5F10C@tzi.org> <cd61162d-803c-4c5a-b2ee-45be87698f32@nostrum.com>
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@mozilla.com>
In-Reply-To: <cd61162d-803c-4c5a-b2ee-45be87698f32@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xml-sg-cmt/vTzqcuz-Wt0merCETly3SfVDIuw>
Subject: Re: [Xml-sg-cmt] Fwd: [rfc-i] Yet another RFCXMLv3 grammar bug
X-BeenThere: xml-sg-cmt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working list for the xml and style guide change management team <xml-sg-cmt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xml-sg-cmt>, <mailto:xml-sg-cmt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/xml-sg-cmt/>
List-Post: <mailto:xml-sg-cmt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xml-sg-cmt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xml-sg-cmt>, <mailto:xml-sg-cmt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2021 16:01:46 -0000

That fell off my radar but I will have time to work on it before year's end.

https://github.com/rfc-format/draft-iab-xml2rfc-v3-bis/issues/200

On 12/3/21 8:56 AM, Robert Sparks wrote:
> What is the timeline for the general normalization we've been discussing 
> (it feels like for years now)?
> 
> RjS
> 
> 
> 
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> Subject: 	[rfc-i] Yet another RFCXMLv3 grammar bug
> Date: 	Fri, 3 Dec 2021 12:22:26 +0100
> From: 	Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
> To: 	RFC Interest <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
> 
> 
> 
> https://xml2rfc.tools.ietf.org/xml2rfc-doc-3.11.1.html#name-bcp14-2
> 
> This element can be a child element of <annotation>, <blockquote>, <dd>, 
> <dt>, <em>, <li>, <name>, <refcontent>, <strong>, <sub>, <sup>, <t>, 
> <td>, <th>, and <tt>.
> 
> … but not cref.
> 
> This means I cannot discuss BCP14 keywords in editorial notes.
> 
> (No, leaving off the BCP14 is not an option, a MUST NOT is a MUST NOT.
> But of course I can upgrade the spelling in the cref to mUsT NoT.)
> 
> I stick with my general comment that tweaking the individual content 
> models to reflect some imagined policy (or should I say “policy that 
> reflects lack of imagination”) is the wrong way to do this. If something 
> is allowed at the span level anywhere, it MUST be allowed everywhere at 
> the span level.
> (This also should evaporate most of the noise in the grammar.)
> 
> Grüße, Carsten
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rfc-interest mailing list
> rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email