Re: [xml2rfc-dev] docName?

[Henrik Levkowetz <[e-mail]>]

Hi Miek,

On 2019-05-09 08:03, Miek Gieben wrote:
> [ Quoting <[e-mail]> in "Re: [xml2rfc-dev] docName?..." ]
>>On 08.04.2019 23:48, Miek Gieben wrote:
>>>Hi,
>>>
>>>Compiling an xml doc with v3, gives this error:
>>>
>>>Parsing file 8341.xml
>>>8341.xml(3): Warning: Expected a 'docName' attribute in the <rfc/>
>>>element, but found none.
>>>
>>>Is docName now back ?
>>
>>Actually is was never gone in xml2rfc as per
>><https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-levkowetz-xml2rfc-v3-implementation-notes-08#section-3.1.21.5>.
>>
>>Note that I agree with Henrik's summary, but it sure would be cool if we
>>had a coherent description of what v3-as-accepted-by-xml2rfc is.
> 
> So, what's the state of this? XML not having a docName are rejected: https://github.com/mmarkdown/mmark/issues/76
> while the parser only emit a warning...

I'd like to know the rejection message from the datatracker.  There are
any number of possible rejection reasons that have nothing to do with
docName, even if the description in #76 seems to indicate that it's related.

I may be able to fish the rejection reason out if I know the draft name and
submission date.  Could you provide that?

I'll check the code to see if the warning should be an error, but would really
like to see the rejection message to understand what's up.

> I know need to make code changes for something that is actually not described 
> anywhere, but seems mandatory.

You can expect that docName will continue to be needed.


Regards,

	Henrik