[xml2rfc-dev] Please help review v3 file: draft-ietf-roll-efficient-npdao-15

Sandy Ginoza <sginoza@amsl.com> Mon, 05 August 2019 21:16 UTC

Return-Path: <sginoza@amsl.com>
X-Original-To: xml2rfc-dev@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xml2rfc-dev@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05A0A1202A5 for <xml2rfc-dev@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Aug 2019 14:16:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.198
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.198 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5-7zQ8V3XyDz for <xml2rfc-dev@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Aug 2019 14:16:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.amsl.com (c8a.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BDE81202C1 for <xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Aug 2019 14:16:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D72A21C1352; Mon, 5 Aug 2019 14:16:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c8a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id x_u_kPMWE2Bu; Mon, 5 Aug 2019 14:16:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2605:e000:1524:de:61ac:a2b9:1254:5f35] (unknown [IPv6:2605:e000:1524:de:61ac:a2b9:1254:5f35]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 512811C1350; Mon, 5 Aug 2019 14:16:14 -0700 (PDT)
From: Sandy Ginoza <sginoza@amsl.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_E7173CA9-CDFD-44F1-BC49-73A10EFAA392"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Message-Id: <21700B17-8C83-4F58-932B-A713684FFE20@amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2019 14:16:47 -0700
Cc: RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
To: xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xml2rfc-dev/SFHkdWWI0kKlSkJfxStcaaQBl-I>
Subject: [xml2rfc-dev] Please help review v3 file: draft-ietf-roll-efficient-npdao-15
X-BeenThere: xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion about particulars of xml2rfc V3 design, development and code." <xml2rfc-dev.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xml2rfc-dev>, <mailto:xml2rfc-dev-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/xml2rfc-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xml2rfc-dev-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xml2rfc-dev>, <mailto:xml2rfc-dev-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2019 21:16:53 -0000

Hi again,

Continuing with our request to review XMLv3 files, we’d appreciate your input regarding draft-ietf-roll-efficient-npdao-15.  We’re hoping some of you will take the time to review the files and provide feedback regarding whether the updates are as expected and the XMLv3 files are considered “good” v3 files.  

NOTE: We are aware there is an issue w/ sectionFormat (e.g., it causes text to disappear in Section 4.3.2 of this document). This issue has been reported.

A couple of other notes:
- we focused on format only; we did not make editorial updates. 
- the diff files compare the initial v2v3 output with the files we edited.

Please review the following files related to draft-ietf-roll-efficient-npdao-15: 

https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-roll-efficient-npdao-15-RE.v2v3.html <https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-roll-efficient-npdao-15-RE.v2v3.html>
https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-roll-efficient-npdao-15-RE.v2v3.pdf <https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-roll-efficient-npdao-15-RE.v2v3.pdf>
https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-roll-efficient-npdao-15-RE.v2v3.txt <https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-roll-efficient-npdao-15-RE.v2v3.txt>
https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-roll-efficient-npdao-15-RE.v2v3.xml <https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-roll-efficient-npdao-15-RE.v2v3.xml>

Diff files:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-roll-efficient-npdao-15-RE.v2v3-xmldiff.html <https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-roll-efficient-npdao-15-RE.v2v3-xmldiff.html>
https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-roll-efficient-npdao-15-RE.v2v3-htmlwdiff.html <https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-roll-efficient-npdao-15-RE.v2v3-htmlwdiff.html>


Thanks,
Sandy