Re: [xml2rfc-dev] RFC 7991 issue #39: Schema Issue, RFC 7991, New Section 2.20.4, "indent" Attribute
Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Mon, 01 October 2018 12:09 UTC
Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: xml2rfc-dev@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xml2rfc-dev@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C34E6130E5D for <xml2rfc-dev@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Oct 2018 05:09:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v7jQxMWgnUKy for <xml2rfc-dev@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Oct 2018 05:09:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 252CA120072 for <xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Oct 2018 05:09:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.34] ([217.91.35.233]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Lr32V-1fTETs0Wjj-00eaj7; Mon, 01 Oct 2018 14:09:19 +0200
Received: from [192.168.1.34] ([217.91.35.233]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Lr32V-1fTETs0Wjj-00eaj7; Mon, 01 Oct 2018 14:09:19 +0200
To: henrik@levkowetz.com, xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org
References: <E1g6wUz-0002Cp-91@durif.tools.ietf.org>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <d1acab8a-6807-5840-50e4-b96d698849dc@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2018 14:09:18 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <E1g6wUz-0002Cp-91@durif.tools.ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:KR2F5dQdzyeXcTYArEERHqrP60APwFxeit0WenND5tQZn/1ywxn d5zo9SlgzmrDcECQuG1seTauBDOE+qIanr6b6Ntf76QIinyJmAWRF2J7xUkQW3bElxXpOip dpMFPMef5w4VGiBtdZoGVJJtjSUAgOYjQGV7YyJPouVCodb6rTUdTMeDRrxHWioeLXhQtXo lw55Coir7zebiC+a+Xi3g==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:zWTMNt4OCOE=:aFB4aOWJ7e1z6thKWeYMKU v3z72T8rDKgge+VAfDKjdbQI6Ja8ArH+WtKuDfI191F2uLyRkmOMvGs8elDc1QoU4x3mBI7k6 LdSoArEoYuZqD62Xd8ahRwnzt4gvnsV6/0aY60/RIOmbOZmYhFfwDeQ0zsYO8xyefvLOz1XyV uQZVlusdsee6VTeHq77vsNc+66saAX2FLVenoTdCpT/i8Gmyp+ROnVJw6AIQFyYN7Jt6JRqPi UWvpyHNXPSv8QAee9cvNh4Nb1l0irk8kgga1yDXMS5kvcmS0rL7sIYH2B+9IDGx3S3ghhecVz mVHAHlOJE8g0lS0gPPYtPTC40ViILwIKyJ4b46dSORAB3nGDuN86WDwLHw2DRZbs7rhiCHY+D ixuDHyDwzME0f/YbgCdkN90q0b5FKjzAVKbqzvdD82LRZ7XcAS2AqrN2wg3giRYYrkfHOg10z 2IkqMlkOQvUuuR/giI3t2fINeLCGb9iKfAWmLl8V81gKZvgBdbDuOVQaPWVsN5wnmczB7Fsqe JLI6+kP5fP5l8JnlH61iAHc/PLaAvePZtHjAUjDDqoxWDTAwRoRUb6d1KQryleyEKu2NUlH+6 Z7rF8iEvKY06XsvOvZ8ujSVShKtrH7EA7PMqdZ+IdyX5hBcHCOEuKTh0ra0JUcgZ0D9NNNIT2 Spy5IQj+KmFEj2b/TqFlIGIL3xmzgutfAK5krS+hn38GupiKXrNrN5zBpHKsmTYNa8Vz9Cn+s WWBSX82v5uDc4blbHuoc2bJWlT5kO7wYBUOrgHzwSUs264FKUPafqICyLkS7+v87buwJGQ0pW j1lqHMnI4d4AabAVhBGL9IAneLXInBDjHcP7wWxBS9v62xdbxU=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xml2rfc-dev/Sob0UZ91g5KjeMzpVGdvp5ibj3M>
Subject: Re: [xml2rfc-dev] RFC 7991 issue #39: Schema Issue, RFC 7991, New Section 2.20.4, "indent" Attribute
X-BeenThere: xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion about particulars of xml2rfc V3 design, development and code." <xml2rfc-dev.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xml2rfc-dev>, <mailto:xml2rfc-dev-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/xml2rfc-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xml2rfc-dev-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xml2rfc-dev>, <mailto:xml2rfc-dev-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2018 12:09:34 -0000
On 10/1/2018 1:36 PM, henrik@levkowetz.com wrote: > This captures an issue noted during implementation, also described in > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-levkowetz-xml2rfc-v3-implementation#section-3.1.4 > > --- > New Section 2.20.4, "indent" Attribute > > The deprecation of the "hangIndent" attribute on <list> leaves no > opportunity to control the size of the hanging indent. In some > definition lists, it is desirable to have a wide indentation, in order > to clearly show the terms, in other cases it is more important to allow > for a larger text volume than the width of the terms would allow. > > Recommendation: Add an "indent" attribute on <dl> to control the size > of the hanging indent. > > Implementation: The current version of xml2rfc does not support the > attribute, but has all the underlying functions needed > to apply such an attribute. Internally, an indentation > is calculated based on length of the <dt> text and the > settings of some of the other attributes. > --- > ... I agree that this would be useful - however we'll need to define it in a way that works well with non-monospaced fonts. Best regards, Julian
- [xml2rfc-dev] RFC 7991 issue #39: Schema Issue, R… henrik
- Re: [xml2rfc-dev] RFC 7991 issue #39: Schema Issu… Julian Reschke
- Re: [xml2rfc-dev] RFC 7991 issue #39: Schema Issu… Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: [xml2rfc-dev] RFC 7991 issue #39: Schema Issu… Julian Reschke
- Re: [xml2rfc-dev] RFC 7991 issue #39: Schema Issu… Jim Schaad
- Re: [xml2rfc-dev] RFC 7991 issue #39: Schema Issu… Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: [xml2rfc-dev] RFC 7991 issue #39: Schema Issu… Jim Schaad
- Re: [xml2rfc-dev] [Ext] RFC 7991 issue #39: Schem… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [xml2rfc-dev] RFC 7991 issue #39: Schema Issu… Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: [xml2rfc-dev] RFC 7991 issue #39: Schema Issu… Jim Schaad
- Re: [xml2rfc-dev] RFC 7991 issue #39: Schema Issu… Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: [xml2rfc-dev] [Ext] RFC 7991 issue #39: Schem… Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: [xml2rfc-dev] [Ext] RFC 7991 issue #39: Schem… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [xml2rfc-dev] [Ext] RFC 7991 issue #39: Schem… Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: [xml2rfc-dev] RFC 7991 issue #39: Schema Issu… Jim Schaad
- Re: [xml2rfc-dev] RFC 7991 issue #39: Schema Issu… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [xml2rfc-dev] RFC 7991 issue #39: Schema Issu… Henrik Levkowetz