Re: [xml2rfc-dev] Fwd: Please help review v3 files: draft-ietf-sipcore-rejected-09, draft-ietf-lamps-pkix-shake-15, & draft-ietf-lisp-introduction-13

Tom Pusateri <pusateri@bangj.com> Tue, 06 August 2019 12:08 UTC

Return-Path: <pusateri@bangj.com>
X-Original-To: xml2rfc-dev@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xml2rfc-dev@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B06E12035D for <xml2rfc-dev@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Aug 2019 05:08:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bangj.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2LnRdpmi64qU for <xml2rfc-dev@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Aug 2019 05:08:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from oj.bangj.com (69-77-154-174.static.skybest.com [69.77.154.174]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3BC1612017F for <xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Aug 2019 05:08:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.16.25.192] (69-77-155-155.static.skybest.com [69.77.155.155]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by oj.bangj.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E49B1318EF; Tue, 6 Aug 2019 08:08:29 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=bangj.com; s=201907; t=1565093310; bh=rKPoEy29yIXqlLUsT51OxNty7ifj7kwdKCmRVBygjag=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To:From; b=dRn6m6lKoOr+12f+EgPEiIylyn/dsiAXjtBbJGLC/60WOuEYr0Vca3ju+Q9Zj/jur Vx3sDole/DMhctcqb/ztj1dZvPIcdkclL/AJWR44hHCZHyKW2guV/n464cYdRvAmMN GmeDeXUd2Ih7rsotg8Ix42azu2yuR51Coydqq+d4u75QuemI1oCc2FlJcuAssSsAxL Kd5UcBDte8s8QdD81k3F2Sq/wR9Mo7mrKXqUM2hV9cmadD0RZ7ttcosak7of1UrHFB Z35XVr6Br/q2K615wrAtU8l3Foaohjre2Frcj1IYu5xW3XYEihQFVjAiG/BxsI9uZa ZSsaMopdxVbWg==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-68DF4B90-8F42-408F-AE2C-3C3EE85A9C8F"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Tom Pusateri <pusateri@bangj.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (16G77)
In-Reply-To: <4ABD35F9-3D24-47C5-8F6A-203587453746@amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2019 08:08:29 -0400
Cc: xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org, RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <70AF86F1-7BFD-4AFD-9F8F-328483952D3B@bangj.com>
References: <F0B0EC1C-5A6B-4D58-B7D3-5A7C52CF8E4C@amsl.com> <4ABD35F9-3D24-47C5-8F6A-203587453746@amsl.com>
To: Sandy Ginoza <sginoza@amsl.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xml2rfc-dev/YLOq4SgE7lcYxHAl14qVuRhufeg>
Subject: Re: [xml2rfc-dev] Fwd: Please help review v3 files: draft-ietf-sipcore-rejected-09, draft-ietf-lamps-pkix-shake-15, & draft-ietf-lisp-introduction-13
X-BeenThere: xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion about particulars of xml2rfc V3 design, development and code." <xml2rfc-dev.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xml2rfc-dev>, <mailto:xml2rfc-dev-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/xml2rfc-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xml2rfc-dev-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xml2rfc-dev>, <mailto:xml2rfc-dev-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2019 12:08:43 -0000

Can you remind us of the criteria for evaluation? Are they written down anywhere? Are mobile devices part of the review?

Thanks,
Tom

> On Aug 6, 2019, at 1:54 AM, Sandy Ginoza <sginoza@amsl.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> A few more files for review.  Our previous notes continue to apply.  Additionally, note that draft-ietf-lamps-pkix-shake-15 demonstrates the use of <!— comments —> is sometimes problematic, as some text may disappears.  We have reported this issue.  
> 
> 
> Files related to draft-ietf-sipcore-rejected-09:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-sipcore-rejected-09-LB.v2v3.html 
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-sipcore-rejected-09-LB.v2v3.pdf
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-sipcore-rejected-09-LB.v2v3.txt
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-sipcore-rejected-09-LB.v2v3.xml 
> 
> Diff files:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-sipcore-rejected-09-LB.v2v3-xmldiff.html 
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-sipcore-rejected-09-LB.v2v3-htmlwdiff.html 
> 
> 
> 
> Files related to draft-ietf-lamps-pkix-shake-15: 
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-lamps-pkix-shake-15-RV.v2v3.html 
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-lamps-pkix-shake-15-RV.v2v3.pdf 
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-lamps-pkix-shake-15-RV.v2v3.txt 
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-lamps-pkix-shake-15-RV.v2v3.xml 
> 
> Diff files:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-lamps-pkix-shake-15-RV.v2v3-xmldiff.html 
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-lamps-pkix-shake-15-RV.v2v3-alt-htmlwdiff.html 
> 
> 
> 
> Files related to draft-ietf-lisp-introduction-13:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-lisp-introduction-13-MS.v2v3.html 
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-lisp-introduction-13-MS.v2v3.pdf 
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-lisp-introduction-13-MS.v2v3.txt 
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-lisp-introduction-13-MS.v2v3.xml 
> 
> Diff files:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-lisp-introduction-13-MS.v2v3-xmldiff.html 
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-lisp-introduction-13-MS.v2v3-htmlwdiff.html 
> 
> 
> Thanks!
> Sandy
> 
> 
> 
>> Begin forwarded message:
>> 
>> From: Sandy Ginoza <sginoza@amsl.com>
>> Subject: Please help review v3 file: draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-multi-stream-optimisation-12
>> Date: August 5, 2019 at 4:30:02 PM PDT
>> To: xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org
>> Cc: RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
>> 
>> Hi again,
>> 
>> Continuing with our request to review XMLv3 files, we’d appreciate your input regarding draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-multi-stream-optimisation-12.  We’re hoping some of you will take the time to review the files and provide feedback regarding whether the updates are as expected and the XMLv3 files are considered “good” v3 files.  
>> 
>> NOTEs:  
>> - As previously mentioned, we are aware there is an issue w/ sectionFormat.
>> Example: text is missing from the output (Section 3.1) after this XML
>> <xref target="RFC3550" sectionFormat="comma" section="6.3.7"/>
>> 
>> - Although it gives an error currently, our understanding is that using xref in this manner (or similar) to create a link to a specific section of an I-D will be possible (without relying on the target attribute of the corresponding reference), per discussion with Henrik.
>> <xref target="RTP-STREAMS" sectionFormat="of" section="5.4"/>
>> 
>> - we focused on format only; we did not make editorial updates. 
>> 
>> - the diff files compare the initial v2v3 output with the files we edited.
>> 
>> Please review the following files related to draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-multi-stream-optimisation-12:
>> 
>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-multi-stream-optimisation-12-KC.v2v3.html
>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-multi-stream-optimisation-12-KC.v2v3.pdf
>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-multi-stream-optimisation-12-KC.v2v3.txt
>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-multi-stream-optimisation-12-KC.v2v3.xml
>> 
>> Diff files:
>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-multi-stream-optimisation-12-KC.v2v3-xmldiff.html
>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/v3test/draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-multi-stream-optimisation-12-KC.v2v3-htmlwdiff.html
>> 
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Sandy 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> xml2rfc-dev mailing list
> xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xml2rfc-dev