[xml2rfc-dev] RFC 7991 issue #40: Schema Issue, RFC 7991, New Section 2.54.2
henrik@levkowetz.com Mon, 01 October 2018 11:36 UTC
Return-Path: <henrik@levkowetz.com>
X-Original-To: xml2rfc-dev@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xml2rfc-dev@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4506B130E60 for <xml2rfc-dev@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Oct 2018 04:36:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.889
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.889 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_MANY_HDRS_LCASE=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0_287gSOkWwx for <xml2rfc-dev@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Oct 2018 04:36:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from durif.tools.ietf.org (durif.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1900:3001:11::3d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A66D130E78 for <xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Oct 2018 04:36:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([::1]:40388 helo=durif.tools.ietf.org) by durif.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <henrik@levkowetz.com>) id 1g6wVR-0006Oi-4Z for xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org; Mon, 01 Oct 2018 04:36:53 -0700
to: xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org
from: henrik@levkowetz.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Message-Id: <E1g6wVR-0006Oi-4Z@durif.tools.ietf.org>
Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2018 04:36:53 -0700
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: ::1
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: henrik@levkowetz.com
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on durif.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xml2rfc-dev/sw_i0HBGxRxDXsqXnBmPqG3EeFY>
Subject: [xml2rfc-dev] RFC 7991 issue #40: Schema Issue, RFC 7991, New Section 2.54.2
X-BeenThere: xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion about particulars of xml2rfc V3 design, development and code." <xml2rfc-dev.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xml2rfc-dev>, <mailto:xml2rfc-dev-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/xml2rfc-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xml2rfc-dev-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xml2rfc-dev>, <mailto:xml2rfc-dev-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2018 11:36:56 -0000
This captures an issue noted during implementation, also described in https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-levkowetz-xml2rfc-v3-implementation#section-3.1.5 --- New Section 2.54.2 The version 3 schema deprecates the previously available 'align' attribute for the tables, and the V2 to V3 converter will remove this attributes if used. This makes a previous feature that was appreciated by some authors unavailable. In the text formatter, the effect is simply to make all tables left-aligned, which may not be the most readable and polished output, but for the HTML formatter it also potentially removes the option of letting text flow around smaller tables in a controlled way. Recommendation: Make the 'align' attribute for tables available again. Implementation: Implemented but inactive in the current version of xml2rfc. The current text formatter code already has support for the 'align' attribute for these elements; but since the schema does not permit the attribute for <table>, the code is never invoked. --- Regards, Henrik --- This issue is tracked at: https://github.com/rfc-format/draft-iab-xml2rfc-v3-bis/issues/40 Discussion should take place on this list.
- [xml2rfc-dev] RFC 7991 issue #40: Schema Issue, R… henrik
- Re: [xml2rfc-dev] RFC 7991 issue #40: Schema Issu… Julian Reschke
- Re: [xml2rfc-dev] RFC 7991 issue #40: Schema Issu… Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: [xml2rfc-dev] RFC 7991 issue #40: Schema Issu… Henrik Levkowetz