Re: [xml2rfc] Novice bad user on device, or Catch-22?

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Mon, 20 January 2020 20:55 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61EC912013D for <xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 12:55:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gmx.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H0oaVVWc_2aU for <xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 12:55:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BEAA612001A for <xml2rfc@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 12:55:21 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1579553676; bh=BAUvbuYkb5hp18STVDmTNLXQskvZfiDbSHW/NCpPXfo=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=P2HCCLY8PG13WfH+TePoUi6vxfnF2Dqeb4hzQWUrnVLjmT93YIcLZMzOJNGdR86fI Zn2y631Y4/cy7UIdC19XUNj2BKY+4pikiQJAzWn3/kvm8GHmgVR7g51l1HdIvXlvKL pQSGB/iD2YxvOrnFOfCm7PHRqQSAl5q+qu59KVmk=
X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c
Received: from [192.168.178.124] ([91.61.63.42]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx005 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MMGRA-1j9fJa2QrO-00JMnX; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 21:54:36 +0100
To: "David R. Oran" <daveoran@orandom.net>, xml2rfc@ietf.org
References: <87E86D51-F37A-4800-BC14-6AA7E5E7EA4A@orandom.net>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <5bb374e6-182d-dd47-802e-28e437e3f7f8@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2020 21:54:35 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <87E86D51-F37A-4800-BC14-6AA7E5E7EA4A@orandom.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:wWJQHz/IB+IcazrLlBq+Ns5Sa775xnd8DfUOZwQVBXBmhre+gYd T28+Bi4ym6TB7WxZU0rsZPb6W04AHA/HEi2iLGEXco0GXiUZQp+H1jqv24pESfgBbq3+Pdl 2ZdndU7gEPGCsPsKrgzU1XQptB9kAww535oi9jRfWZR2COw+SERiZMZjVQx+dOUtwkXRQFU jBjGEV9m2QLgJvg5BMccw==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:V3dOSVaEhJI=:c5bCJs9vQVVjWbj3e3l3vc vhN5v/qYYVmumYq8WABzaDslNlbN6WiW/o5nGrv8geH5WvT88WmXgaB+xFQQ/XQDJEqbA+ylI vZm7ETLuIaRkafhqJB6b6DdvA4xeayZG1cgQhxxQTbl3dKzzsp3ZRVer3I2Qo68BRuQLaH4U7 so/yblM03AZimVPBV9yIW715n+ipxyTl8HfYFIXbxAC4Qrnl1ahqDeZvJ19YCe22go0Mx6EX3 ErE5VljVDvrk55J+UpRpAt4QgL7VLBsdb9N6DBhLqP44CuTxrgUgvKhXHWGI0+PL/6CQuAosC kADxnieINecDaW5yqvjIhc6wiwcro7ZGMDVyTGFKnOClVG3pY6Ze2LuC/blYMbgg3kMRlmJSy dCyyY70beYXLO81slvZP/qOVE1jTwx/lc7UppJkxg+xPoU2cwN6i4qlZ2aoDU7/Wox2FBXBc6 WYV8VyrmsXKF/mUBBQBuUfVv7QaAlVfxW3O9kqJlIdQZWInxBPbo37IrWBodT0qQu5R8MxkCd m6sVbaZ0TjYmeppqUoRjn2ZHe2GRq/7NPY9LENhUb4Pa3HYBSTMdwMYhEzMdxMS6dLGyq17oK /1Iw5qhDgdLdH/lO3VYVy9w2rnNDTRBxAbczRim9Y5pWZYxrcpSOwXX7DH4tLbl1frID45CnI ZbWSzXLG/geIWOgnqYyBXD+XwVYsKrY99RCU1ug+t+5mx3bSOmtrcJYyTpfsSjM9qzzz8Cih0 DYA28CjuzeH6UrqVnvlnq3Qcw79pLliRz2E03PI65ksC9haeJBg3ZKGqORjfQkZpJYy9Dvo5Y HBlojIR//qQ7bgvIO9GcDFlg67i0SvJeln3NtUgtzehMzVPSRcAbOpGfZ9KR0v8oqMrRjzs7h vErI75reeyeXJjnJWMEm6HDzKCmPGi8L78ANIqFgMiB9p6Gyw69MJgzbCjWPcFrbHPdrgcd7S iqNaptFsEuFFuvPVBxtsesvqgy1aaWooHFaw2s2+8T/ExhUO4QbRaMsuJeRGv1V1B5OQHU9qf xuhaYvn0iodfAAdAEN9KSzKkWVXE22evmsIFO9kmL/ZJ0WUepICkTnb2ctb2bc97/TiGf/Au0 LyXuXx9iX+xGWMPdg/e3kRODodNmPJDOm13AIPHjVcHEsrlJ4L/+5qrGj01bvRk5Ly4l+r1NN rG+8l10gi3SURnjs9kl8jmAjveykxgIZ5TbGbJheqlSxyU1D4jXN2YA0Igw9eo7XTpxNP9LOl zf19OEb4N6yxqudRlFNPXbRbc4sX1rrWvSVFo7BA4sPCuIU8wJY9xO63SNHM=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xml2rfc/9D2xkSvnfjRnEFC6UFwWg0EolGc>
Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] Novice bad user on device, or Catch-22?
X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <xml2rfc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xml2rfc>, <mailto:xml2rfc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/xml2rfc/>
List-Post: <mailto:xml2rfc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xml2rfc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xml2rfc>, <mailto:xml2rfc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2020 20:55:25 -0000

On 20.01.2020 21:00, David R. Oran wrote:
> I have a new Internet Draft to write, so I decided to bite the bullet
> and do it in V3. Rather than write in V2 and try the converter, I
> started out right away with V3 syntax. I didn’t get very far. I tried
> both the most recent xml2rfc by installing it on my machine, and the web
> tool and got identical errors.
>
> If I follow the described syntax in RFC7991, the RFC Editor FAQ in
> https://ftp.ripe.net/rfc/v3test/FAQ-2019-02.html and the example in
> draft-hoffman-rfcexamples-latest as below:
>
> |<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?> <!DOCTYPE rfc SYSTEM
> 'rfc2629.dtd'> <?xml-stylesheet type='text/xsl' href='rfc2629.xslt' ?>
> <?rfc strict="yes" ?> <?rfc toc="yes"?> <?rfc tocdepth="4"?> <?rfc
> symrefs="yes" ?> <?rfc sortrefs="yes" ?> <?rfc compact="yes" ?> <?rfc
> subcompact="no" ?> <rfc version=‘3’ ipr='trust200902' category='exp'
> submissionType='IRTF' docName='draft-oran-icnrg-reflexive-forwarding-00'
> xml:lang='en' xmlns:xi="https://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude"> <front>
> <seriesInfo name='Internet-Draft'
> value='draft-oran-icnrg-reflexive-forwarding-00'/> <title abbrev='ICN
> Reflexive Forwarding'>Reflexive Forwarding for CCNx and NDN Protocols
> </title> |
>
> I get
>
> |% xml2rfc draft-oran-icnrg-reflexive-forwarding.xml Incompatible schema
> information: found "rfc2629.dtd" in <DOCTYPE> of a version 3 file. |
> ...

That message is indeed not very helpful. First of all, it doesn't say
what to do; and then, it *assumes* what the contents of rfc2629.dtd
might be, without really knowing.

FWIW, you don't need a DTD declaration; just get rid of it (the same was
already true in v2 times).

Best regards, Julian