Re: [xml2rfc] xml2rfc online: references to I-Ds and associated dates

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Thu, 11 July 2019 23:58 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F36D12007A for <xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 16:58:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.197
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.197 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ktPlvIk0GA4v for <xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 16:58:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E50A12006A for <xml2rfc@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 16:58:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.217.110] (p548DCE40.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.141.206.64]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 45lCgC60TSzyhb; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 01:58:15 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <15CF0049-78B6-46E6-8C84-D26FB1DE3F05@tzi.org>
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2019 01:58:15 +0200
Cc: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>, xml2rfc@ietf.org
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 584582293.448089-5e12a62434e3f16676a80e267fe9b8ee
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <1FBE1F3A-A148-42A8-AAA2-EB7E8F9B2036@tzi.org>
References: <60AB35B3B946D11980DA5426@PSB> <5aa01f36-374b-6236-ecc1-58610d50c6e6@gmail.com> <15CF0049-78B6-46E6-8C84-D26FB1DE3F05@tzi.org>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xml2rfc/C0kXBjGW1n-3Ye7JFECY5UQyJw0>
Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] xml2rfc online: references to I-Ds and associated dates
X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <xml2rfc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xml2rfc>, <mailto:xml2rfc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/xml2rfc/>
List-Post: <mailto:xml2rfc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xml2rfc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xml2rfc>, <mailto:xml2rfc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2019 23:58:21 -0000

On Jul 12, 2019, at 00:52, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:
> 
> Why not reference the specific i-d: 
> 
> {{I-D.draft-ietf-roll-rpl-07}}
> 
> as opposed to latest in series:
> 
> {{I-D.ietf-roll-rpl}}

FYI: here are the reference entries I get from these:

   [I-D.draft-ietf-roll-rpl-07]
              Winter, T., Thubert, P., and R. Team, "RPL: IPv6 Routing
              Protocol for Low power and Lossy Networks", draft-ietf-
              roll-rpl-07 (work in progress), March 2010.

   [I-D.ietf-roll-rpl]
              Winter, T., Thubert, P., Brandt, A., Clausen, T., Hui, J.,
              Kelsey, R., Levis, P., Pister, K., Struik, R., and J.
              Vasseur, "RPL: IPv6 Routing Protocol for Low power and
              Lossy Networks", draft-ietf-roll-rpl-19 (work in
              progress), March 2011.

The date is a red herring.  Dates in RFC references are always Month-Year.
As was noted, adding a day doesn’t help with frequently respun I-Ds.
I think that’s why the draft number is in the bibxml.

(Well, “R. Team” for “ROLL Design Team" *is* a bit funny :-)

Grüße, Carsten