Re: [xml2rfc] Why development version dislikes <!ENTITY RFC2119 PUBLIC ...
Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Tue, 26 July 2011 18:01 UTC
Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DECE111E810E for <xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 11:01:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.399
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.399 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-2.800, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nGP3eYITWUCg for <xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 11:01:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.22]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 919A111E811B for <xml2rfc@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 11:01:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 26 Jul 2011 18:01:41 -0000
Received: from unknown (EHLO [130.129.20.227]) [130.129.20.227] by mail.gmx.net (mp036) with SMTP; 26 Jul 2011 20:01:41 +0200
X-Authenticated: #1915285
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19wqhszaIxwcgp/Jc+oQhOmTKkKWT+H1XiFtYOjG8 nzmavrxzqV/3Yp
Message-ID: <4E2F0102.6000802@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 20:01:38 +0200
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: elwynd@dial.pipex.com
References: <4E2DE139.5040205@gmail.com> <4E2DE7C0.5080108@gmx.de> <4E2E02A1.7060305@gmail.com> <4E2E10DA.7060608@gmail.com> <4E2E28FB.3070608@gmail.com> <4E2E3F32.3050509@it.aoyama.ac.jp> <4E2E4475.4070208@gmail.com> <4E2EDC1C.7000501@dial.pipex.com>
In-Reply-To: <4E2EDC1C.7000501@dial.pipex.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Cc: xml2rfc <xml2rfc@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] Why development version dislikes <!ENTITY RFC2119 PUBLIC ...
X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <xml2rfc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xml2rfc>, <mailto:xml2rfc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xml2rfc>
List-Post: <mailto:xml2rfc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xml2rfc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xml2rfc>, <mailto:xml2rfc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 18:01:45 -0000
On 2011-07-26 17:24, Elwyn Davies wrote: > Hi. > > Should have said draft is > http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-irtf-routing-reqs-11.xml > > I just tried out an old draft that I know contains some unusual features. > > Unfortunately it didn't get as far as checking on these. > > I get a lot of error messages related to entity references: > My imported references are in the form > > *<!ENTITY* RFC3471 SYSTEM > "http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.3471.xml"*> > > The error messages are of the form: > *ERROR: Unable to validate the XML document: INPUT > Line 1406: IDREF attribute target references an unknown ID "RFC3471" > > The problem is doubtless that there are a number of different forms for > these ENTITY definitions! > > Regards, > Elwyn That may be an actual bug; my validators do not see any (serious) problems with that source file. Best regards, Julian
- [xml2rfc] Development version dislikes <!ENTITY R… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [xml2rfc] Development version dislikes <!ENTI… Julian Reschke
- Re: [xml2rfc] Development version dislikes <!ENTI… Elwyn Davies
- Re: [xml2rfc] Development version dislikes <!ENTI… Julian Reschke
- Re: [xml2rfc] Development version dislikes <!ENTI… Tony Hansen
- Re: [xml2rfc] Development version dislikes <!ENTI… Brian E Carpenter
- [xml2rfc] Why development version dislikes <!ENTI… Brian E Carpenter
- [xml2rfc] Development version is picky about <lis… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [xml2rfc] Why development version dislikes <!… Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [xml2rfc] Development version is picky about … Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [xml2rfc] Why development version dislikes <!… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [xml2rfc] Development version is picky about … Nico Williams
- Re: [xml2rfc] Development version dislikes <!ENTI… Tony Hansen
- Re: [xml2rfc] Why development version dislikes <!… Tony Hansen
- Re: [xml2rfc] Why development version dislikes <!… Elwyn Davies
- Re: [xml2rfc] Why development version dislikes <!… Elwyn Davies
- Re: [xml2rfc] Why development version dislikes <!… Elwyn Davies
- Re: [xml2rfc] Why development version dislikes <!… Julian Reschke
- Re: [xml2rfc] Why development version dislikes <!… Elwyn Davies
- Re: [xml2rfc] Why development version dislikes <!… Julian Reschke
- Re: [xml2rfc] Development version is picky about … Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [xml2rfc] Why development version dislikes <!… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [xml2rfc] Why development version dislikes <!… Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [xml2rfc] Development version is picky about … Frank Ellermann
- Re: [xml2rfc] Why development version dislikes <!… Frank Ellermann