IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [xml2rfc] tag DL errors on draft submission

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Fri, 13 December 2019 14:21 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59099120854 for <xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Dec 2019 06:21:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gmx.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VOhXXeTUNDQP for <xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Dec 2019 06:21:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A40312011D for <xml2rfc@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Dec 2019 06:21:32 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1576246885; bh=eSVtry/HujcsrB8wkAPJZBM3cLAcpFqp/0pfm26+d5Y=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=Dg03VG19HQZmvC0jqkilupf36zjkvIDtkHbDyi+BtqHqq/uN1ZB4XINTxLY1VRwwb XrXf1OVwC+pRsFz/DqL0qA0nH+Wns/lHs2IunIM2uHkAKZNKgjyMYPKRoosocIBiy7 x1Ml7PvtLN2rDif6GLmZrHuzhWgS+uBmKp7n1IWE=
X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c
Received: from [192.168.1.34] ([217.91.35.233]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx005 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MUXtS-1iFTUb1k2q-00QRqY; Fri, 13 Dec 2019 15:21:25 +0100
To: Robert Moskowitz <rgm@htt-consult.com>, "xml2rfc@ietf.org" <xml2rfc@ietf.org>
References: <b4acf21c-efb3-8f85-874b-f2a0d627e587@htt-consult.com> <ccab475a-9ad3-b33d-8497-ad16d1a009e9@gmx.de> <d5302682-d2df-2caf-31de-3d73f372c254@htt-consult.com> <10d33dfd-411c-14cf-51ae-79e28b91fa0c@gmx.de> <17e91dbb-66ef-7294-5f38-4e055c88af21@htt-consult.com> <ca462914-a726-cfdf-1a09-7903d6166941@gmx.de> <0dc5d56a-f0ba-4342-0887-b55478bf1710@htt-consult.com>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <bd28eb15-ac1d-1c87-ed49-48e4b8130309@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2019 15:21:24 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <0dc5d56a-f0ba-4342-0887-b55478bf1710@htt-consult.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:zhRwgJ0rI7zW5ly9Wg2F5UXvrKyKQeJu6rKuCnx55/SrEVTeuN9 H7VYbWPHpF9DRTv++mFxoBR+vHU+1EvKUS2dZgb6L9ZcFbBGhhlV3Yk8WpxJWAY6P7h5sMC AkJeEjwGFJKpO746g24mf/yUcMi4V0J5aCEj/q4oXD7FCWYPOz+lP49wpCQ/Mit26WpJxDK MPdtDmwE+0aX/0ukXgC0g==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:KN7QvQwAYf4=:u0OSHGJ98075BKLqAhxw8S HJFryOfnIwed4F6d0sKhyRc1w3YLXvpC6L4b33PE0FzuKb/VNOBxH68cuEgLHobMh+yzNLJEc xNSAxmuDylVZX6Qe4n50fXHv9jJuKU9lb9xwQNW7YSSp5+txzW9sAo8B3kodxTA4kdLdlTnTb VS3ghtm2pTZlR8pztcOhHgfzODYnw9RSn6SFzmcAbg1/+AXdMmKO0+UvgsTBg90rMB0ZX+vJs FqGXxgMKK9grbNWqzlK7E/hQovScWixFVifhkllwrtdx2xCznNVwxzYWRx1mTy4xrefUTFfba 6NaP3lRPMFWsequmP289YCSdlBWTDj/bvlOnaskbmaWvro1Cj9yNChBg5veE0Yvw4euLDIHVL QoV7LHLF84FaztD+D17italZRxVSNGtchMD/vajDhP66E+O4Pacr7y0Td0ctwaMhHzjgIq4vJ /yn9uO0Ctbg7RV6eWRGsAVOWPss+6sjTxD/QGvYrzNZgS0xirNkSyojtcY4RlulO49QN6cy78 FpN3pzCWbT3EmHDgE5LM5LBut3+abJNs4v2EImDSDE7VrzYGzYoVp2251O+3P4638t/uS2rv2 nDtB7KxaNdXUHnRD+T0e4AcvKR6rInqXzLp96z+CHdCqz4Nro16yNRdA6kMc8rzK574MTFd2C rQa6oJTXahSCuCcXsOBqx/oYttPhNcUsDBDqwDTux9dQZdEO38GK+FYOu3GhxaJT5Uzitvu+s AqKlHIRaReUMpOuTNCAvmKJ77JlWbaryV9bFODQfdcJ68Vg6cuJ30I2ZkvICbo9LGM2FglxJV yB5UevjyBZWjXspfwRH9HuaCwKJOHiqCk2w4Xu9U5pqE7qUPq6h3rPF8h/Rio2YVj5+GDwA9B PuAjnbpXBABiq0UsjpYbQR6D++vpUDprlC+eZXLvsXuhvNeAuTod2YJFlxCjWO2WmKqmLrYwk tWXA9pb+syIbFu4jgpkHz58AhWjFvAgak7e6VqV4aSwE2HClY9jRC5ZaA1seQDI5tQWSvbBn1 Pf95Alwq5Q3VqDdRgbjShWnBTkrdRXlErlHov0mw2pcPwgVEf3z9yUh2fgQ+XvZp0p3sy9SQ1 CiLcqtRqCNDU8bpkwWWhLiax2s7WdIjmUPX76WSBb+r9UWrl2uB1SnW3JQgysEIU4grf3Y93D tshrBF0FOc8LNoF7wPLm6QYohTiEJjieLbuKaXIUOwfF99ENwM4nyaRy56Qqg8X+whaW6utAL rmF6wxiuu+Izk9xH3OqIx8dLFlbAY+6QNdq7gI5NQM+UBtkAB/vC5wK9PtcE=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xml2rfc/G2dV8rDhA8jBWm-EIKNACOhIpKM>
Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] tag DL errors on draft submission
X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <xml2rfc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xml2rfc>, <mailto:xml2rfc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/xml2rfc/>
List-Post: <mailto:xml2rfc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xml2rfc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xml2rfc>, <mailto:xml2rfc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2019 14:21:35 -0000

On 13.12.2019 15:10, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
>
> On 12/13/19 9:04 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:
>> On 13.12.2019 14:47, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>>> OH, I have not submitted draft-moskowitz-orchid-cshake-01 yet.  I only
>>> made the changes to the definition section  in preparation for making
>>> other changes.
>>>
>>> So the submit rejection is only on the new-crypto xml.  Both passed the
>>> xml2rfc script.
>>> ...
>>
>> Interesting.
>>
>> Both pass for me with "--v3"; both fail for me without.
>>
>> The fact that <dl> is accepted as a child node of <t> seems to be a bug
>> in xml2rfc; you should report it at
>> <https://trac.tools.ietf.org/tools/xml2rfc/trac/>.
>
> I will do that after we figure out why without the <t> it still failed
> the submission.
>
> See attached.
>
> One or more XML validation errors occurred when processing the XML file:
> draft-moskowitz-hip-new-crypto-03.xml: Line 123: Element section content
> does not follow the DTD, expecting ((t | figure | texttable | iref)* ,
> section*), got (dl)
 > ...

xml2rfc tries to validate this as v2 document, and fails.

I don't know how the submission system detects "v3". Minimally, you
probably should set the version attribute on the <rfc> element; see
<https://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/rfc7991.html#element.rfc.attribute.version>.

Best regards, Julian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email