IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [xml2rfc] [rfc-i] will <vspace=n> disappear

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Fri, 07 November 2014 07:10 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98FF01ACEFF for <xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Nov 2014 23:10:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.55
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.55 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yyFBXvOHlbsS for <xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Nov 2014 23:10:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9::12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 27DB61ACEFC for <xml2rfc@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Nov 2014 23:10:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at informatik.uni-bremen.de
Received: from smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de (smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de [134.102.224.120]) by mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id sA77A5fP018966; Fri, 7 Nov 2014 08:10:05 +0100 (CET)
Received: from alma.local.informatik.uni-bremen.de (robin.informatik.uni-bremen.de [134.102.218.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 09112685; Fri, 7 Nov 2014 08:10:03 +0100 (CET)
X-Mailer: emacs 25.0.50.1 (via feedmail 11-beta-1 I)
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <545C5CE4.1030206@gmx.de> (Julian Reschke's message of "Fri, 07 Nov 2014 06:47:16 +0100")
References: <543FD40B.5030308@pi.nu> <543FF9E6.2080001@seantek.com> <54400057.3030904@gmx.de> <CAK3OfOi-P9wU_6R4EGDg9ADRpWtuHRDX9nT7GgrtvtPqU00gcQ@mail.gmail.com> <201410241535.s9OFZxbb013893@hobgoblin.ariadne.com> <CAK3OfOh7fsgV8YAONBOVMH39uJT9vZiDzD5wNRk6+7OvwFZbjQ@mail.gmail.com> <201410271412.s9RECwPk014078@hobgoblin.ariadne.com> <575D9661-9E76-4251-B7A4-3BEA9C80098C@tzi.org> <6C2BC58B-0202-4DAD-89BB-C8AC897F32C9@cisco.com> <544E69E1.30306@att.com> <544E6C9D.4040409@earthlink.net> <544F64BD.4090503@gmx.de> <544FA88D.8020700@att.com> <20141029213538.60C0F1A90B0@ietfa.amsl.com> <5452A323.8010607@gmx.de> <006f01cff9f2$4267bb50$c73731f0$@augustcellars.com> <545BF2E2.4060706@gmx.de> <93E1F41F-2148-4BF7-82A6-8E1A3DFAF825@tzi.org> <545C5CE4.1030206@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (darwin)
Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2014 23:09:44 -0800
Message-ID: <m0389vlc5j.fsf@tzi.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xml2rfc/RWOpUEgpKjPUNXFBDvhgVln6B5k
Cc: "rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org" <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>, "xml2rfc@ietf.org" <xml2rfc@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] [rfc-i] will <vspace=n> disappear
X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <xml2rfc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xml2rfc>, <mailto:xml2rfc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xml2rfc/>
List-Post: <mailto:xml2rfc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xml2rfc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xml2rfc>, <mailto:xml2rfc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2014 07:10:11 -0000

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> writes:

> On 2014-11-07 05:48, Carsten Bormann wrote:
>
>> I thought the v3 equivalent of preamble etc. was just doing t in figure.
>
> Not as per
> <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hoffman-xml2rfc-12#section-2.25>.
>
> Best regards, Julian

Oh, 1.2.3:

>   o  Deprecate <preamble> and <postamble> in favor of simply using <t>.
>      This also deprecates the "align" attribute in <figure>.

Didn't check for consistency (or if this sentence has another possible
meaning than my conjecture above).

Gruesse, Carsten

v2.39.1 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status