Re: [xml2rfc] Where can I find a summary of the proposed RFC format changes?

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Sat, 08 November 2014 03:18 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B52701A020A for <xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Nov 2014 19:18:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ONGRvFWYxmpp for <xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Nov 2014 19:18:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pa0-x22b.google.com (mail-pa0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22b]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 234411A019B for <xml2rfc@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Nov 2014 19:18:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pa0-f43.google.com with SMTP id eu11so4718462pac.2 for <xml2rfc@ietf.org>; Fri, 07 Nov 2014 19:18:51 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=8V8ZveNkD1ja2bkyCbZoZugDaB39+KSb8Afnh8ah4PE=; b=0k13R949Kl4SUaAjpE951bAH9w0PITyZY6m1pssVFr/A5AWZ6qxsk439x+Qww9VcIc w6pfSRBShjr7y4QP9bt1TWhyHGcUNXbfotrR8IcAheYCPCdwTPxHUr5dqCZex0q3vxk9 So0JC3QPdoLgukDXEku5pA8S6rIOfOvLHEqXvz2QG74YkEpZuq0uzjTC7peE8K3aWQtm fE/i4E9i3mdSLUyrDfkdlKrs9f6lzSsg52OBkJxwObtDOSWX6lnBeKErU5vYJ4ybH6b9 ddK5pA2ih7WxBCEKOcWINlE9QEYpKqny6NlwAUfI3pNLK/rhyOZ0qVTAlgFBNOwW+bqs IokA==
X-Received: by 10.68.104.194 with SMTP id gg2mr16188814pbb.119.1415416731383; Fri, 07 Nov 2014 19:18:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [107.17.56.135] ([64.129.13.2]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id gm11sm10015988pbd.63.2014.11.07.19.18.49 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 07 Nov 2014 19:18:50 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <545D8BA3.6000707@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 08 Nov 2014 16:18:59 +1300
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Charlie Perkins <charles.perkins@earthlink.net>
References: <543FD40B.5030308@pi.nu> <54400057.3030904@gmx.de> <CAK3OfOi-P9wU_6R4EGDg9ADRpWtuHRDX9nT7GgrtvtPqU00gcQ@mail.gmail.com> <201410241535.s9OFZxbb013893@hobgoblin.ariadne.com> <CAK3OfOh7fsgV8YAONBOVMH39uJT9vZiDzD5wNRk6+7OvwFZbjQ@mail.gmail.com> <201410271412.s9RECwPk014078@hobgoblin.ariadne.com> <575D9661-9E76-4251-B7A4-3BEA9C80098C@tzi.org> <6C2BC58B-0202-4DAD-89BB-C8AC897F32C9@cisco.com> <544E69E1.30306@att.com> <544E6C9D.4040409@earthlink.net> <544F64BD.4090503@gmx.de> <544FA88D.8020700@att.com> <20141029213538.60C0F1A90B0@ietfa.amsl.com> <5452A323.8010607@gmx.de> <006f01cff9f2$4267bb50$c73731f0$@augustcellars.com> <545BF2E2.4060706@gmx.de> <93E1F41F-2148-4BF7-82A6-8E1A3DFAF825@tzi.org> <545C5CE4.1030206@gmx.de> <m0389vlc5j.fsf@tzi.org> <545C979E.1090805@gmx.de> <8F5881C0-4A04-495D-AEC6-C73CFE3B2461@vpnc.org> <CAK3OfOhi4t3KvULob1Y0ZVBQPg2SQ3Gp=OTfbMaLNvH9KrPODw@mail.gmail.com> <545D2745.5010409@earthlink.net> <F9575B83-BBA2-438E-B1E1-D4B09F234A90@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <F9575B83-BBA2-438E-B1E1-D4B09F234A90@vpnc.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xml2rfc/zaqFlZM4G7Xq2xryiv-DDPvRigw
Cc: "xml2rfc@ietf.org" <xml2rfc@ietf.org>, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] Where can I find a summary of the proposed RFC format changes?
X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <xml2rfc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xml2rfc>, <mailto:xml2rfc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xml2rfc/>
List-Post: <mailto:xml2rfc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xml2rfc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xml2rfc>, <mailto:xml2rfc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Nov 2014 03:18:53 -0000

For the overall picture, https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-flanagan-rfc-framework
is a good starting point IMHO. It points to all the other relevant drafts.

    Brian


On 08/11/2014 09:37, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> On Nov 7, 2014, at 12:10 PM, Charlie Perkins <charles.perkins@earthlink.net> wrote:
>> Hello Julian and all,
>>
>> I'd like to understand the proposed changes to the RFC format.  Can you
>> or anyone point me to the relevant document(s)?
> 
> The discussion is happening on the rfc-interest mailing list (and sometimes leaks to here, but this list is really about the current format and tools only). There has already been a lot of discussion there, certainly much more than here.
> 
> The draft of the v3 format is at <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hoffman-xml2rfc>. There are a bunch of related drafts about the output formats, and an RFC <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6949>.
> 
> --Paul Hoffman
> _______________________________________________
> xml2rfc mailing list
> xml2rfc@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xml2rfc
>