Re: [xml2rfc] can xref section= reference an anchor?

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Mon, 16 December 2019 17:01 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CBEE12085E for <xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Dec 2019 09:01:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gmx.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BkBGVm8dy81c for <xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Dec 2019 09:01:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0B2B12085C for <xml2rfc@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Dec 2019 09:01:27 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1576515678; bh=oViIFSKJEFA+cesz9ZEsWrPumopfxFHm+VNLeSm/sms=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=JXcMOvYqZrko/17wgaI0MvxHpMLfGBathaG1VCTptJcuJxBlNVf05H9SDmvlyNct4 ZuXl7rOeIPHmBBWqM+cQpnNE6eUPkYNWm0oZvHm+4Jqro8kQxfzGAYHYQn3mqJLCpJ cZrmsj0SiIGpUoLmI8nXZ7+l/mRTAu+fqANBdUCw=
X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c
Received: from [192.168.178.124] ([91.61.56.199]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx105 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MhU5b-1i2KC63x7D-00eeCf; Mon, 16 Dec 2019 18:01:18 +0100
To: Robert Moskowitz <rgm@htt-consult.com>, "xml2rfc@ietf.org" <xml2rfc@ietf.org>
References: <5d192de5-c6ca-aa1f-b7e0-0500704e491a@htt-consult.com>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <13eeba5e-bb17-a0dc-cf21-8380150f480d@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2019 18:01:12 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <5d192de5-c6ca-aa1f-b7e0-0500704e491a@htt-consult.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:blORKnPKC7XBwWukC8FSKaWI1LTCky70y4fO7S67/vkvWJZX9hk 485tnj5CfSc/lPaJuq2cAj5RwGSSb1vPg0MHq3vLMJPPrCcI4kxfvwIRHeo2K5/YCavUYjW F9zqpniMearYWYxRmheHIeBZhFv0DuW3+CATknjJgHZdOSLl/hrWqrh1DsM+h6RACHbhpsb IYrLA9Sd8drLk1T9Ew6QQ==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:VaI3UBGDPGU=:SL72GPl8WtTEAegF+PlVPG btGXmcMsA3dJye2vquPeQzsbfr9gIl1vnGMVHuPPyCzHNHC1gEuvwUhWBW1fk1zEYI33bcz61 gc6fe2AQ8yciHu+gDnqS11XL9JBF8aniFJrwFGttfHWAk+6XKUc88YZ5e/5vNE8ijur9kKJOP p9IeAFB3+87apAlnOSTSEweH73D/43kpydoFocfbp9mcdp2IcuJ/ZNKQnii4AXLl1MFcX2+sz 41kdR73bft8vaj5nVER+fYjc3m/cr56LSAR7VqY/HV8PrdijX2tCm+v9TKvVnOIv27GRVhHvC TujJr3BuB+Y12E4bavc2hS566ruNk7w6aV7SWVDZ5q7ladB5NNjinXtPA7ZleyCl1zAosdS0w 11G18dQLR4b0N8iahT0SfIPX8pwJB6X3lkIRXRnKos6uhSVQ4rrkLG6Qe3iSe8qLRWsKa0IQB rZocIiE8/jG7GxqIrFRvIDKCjnajxpHSxMua7ZuIEf6j39g16s0eDmOCAqRUkre1zwyZcS2V/ OA+u2cQ10ErgKvwXmB17ee1YlGY02aaapZRf38r6eKuDtjQA5TWn6rSaGrNE0+ZAF6NLH2DkB XO5R22aq8GCMuF8O8/pf8K+dnbDBiEh9SUIqNOnEldIHNfuZgFDYpSJ3RTb1ZVDj3ulCMpb8Y DJYJR/QEMTckkcuLuJAOEn/cH0L+A+o5sxtQQoUbHle/Rv45a9QTDC/gbBRJd37Rf/rTcifni fLVLJn5KREOFK/jwDL45QqKvUEShvUj2gUNIbX926cAC6WW2Ny1DThcfvv+6VSSw2bCrx9yPM UknN+BO/3FoOPWbiRNyViiH/DZPrNHZbQoPacIEbjJuMNPQZjmmiFha/hwWFx+1c6nwJUZ8Ed KHfop7E3/dDtCAOPnst0sgZnNVxok5uTXYDrq9H07XVn/OacDjY7v4KAC6dqoeo7wpeVqTg29 8NNgdQVGoxy/kA9F04te4aBsVjvUIYPX6Hb+5Lb/SXCPjqL60AxFLGUEJpj1TdbKTiSzMANow ccXu+aAG5IiSmSCep3lH3RMJJrvieKf985zDjNrOeZV7BGo1NEBz38ywyeY8CvYgq/NruX219 pBHGab7z3fqzgvimM1BZAjkwn+mdKxfldtI/3J1xEc2JfiPw5fbjJAi+51+SvKhoKwpjW57JI IHWH67onCGLSFo0WboXFI3nRBbRXb81gc82pheYbqd3HjDABQ7m4yXpFQxWjWne4u+MWKoK2c Qzp9e8t2PUWNat9OkQQqaSlVAMY/U3rTuQlEsGfJauhEpaW473hVLJbqHVRk=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xml2rfc/_xogeFjmhse7249xURcSq2PKeqs>
Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] can xref section= reference an anchor?
X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <xml2rfc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xml2rfc>, <mailto:xml2rfc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/xml2rfc/>
List-Post: <mailto:xml2rfc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xml2rfc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xml2rfc>, <mailto:xml2rfc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2019 17:01:30 -0000

On 16.12.2019 17:47, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> I see examples of section=5 for RFCs, but for IDs, the section number
> will tend to be version specific.
>
> Is there a way to reference the anchor label for the desired section?
>
> I am missing it in the FAQs.

You set anchor="label" on the section that you want to reference, and
then use <xref target="label"/> in order to reference it.

Best regards, Julian