IETF Logo Mail Archive

[xml2rfc] future work: a <bcp26> element, by analogy with <bcp14>

Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net> Thu, 12 May 2022 15:36 UTC

Return-Path: <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B6F6C1594B7 for <xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 May 2022 08:36:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.302
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.302 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (unsupported algorithm ed25519-sha256)" header.d=fifthhorseman.net header.b=wusO7mD/; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fifthhorseman.net header.b=ND2r/Jct
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id P5mAvDlbWfMY for <xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 May 2022 08:36:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from che.mayfirst.org (unknown [162.247.75.117]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13F88C1594B9 for <xml2rfc@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 May 2022 08:36:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=fifthhorseman.net; i=@fifthhorseman.net; q=dns/txt; s=2019; t=1652369792; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : mime-version : content-type : from; bh=jy1MEAWJpzriPcQy/k2/j+MlT65/0ShCtQtyLR8wFFg=; b=wusO7mD/8jvUY4oO1Y4DvQp4pg5vIQDehBrj4mwsCJY3re8rBZjxl9MmUAAraoCtxE2GA uy7epTJbUXbLiznCQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=fifthhorseman.net; i=@fifthhorseman.net; q=dns/txt; s=2019rsa; t=1652369792; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : mime-version : content-type : from; bh=jy1MEAWJpzriPcQy/k2/j+MlT65/0ShCtQtyLR8wFFg=; b=ND2r/JctJLO0qyhFa7xEqtuywF0uxNmmP9dBsKw4esdWzXK0S/NXHHV4tZLcw9xzYANEp P+ZpX31/ru/7YLeiVMfPuNI8hF13LHAOxg1rjnUKzlNwVDdFrGS88qv7/P5shf9139qeMDV Zch3gpcjsZfIXKqQCjvU61mj1unttyo4lqTRJh6kAxHV8kpNuj2G6adKociqvDarSdf+TNM oP+IaB6E7EIhwnDxx7S9/paMv/1I+AhnBh49LlykSM5gGhc4HFlBxYDj4jPZr0UQCnV0BMD 3rnphax/qn9RWDgOPKLxEpiU0ymSeQRxRsWN3JVNsHVKPAOEO3n1uZkwFTGQ==
Received: from fifthhorseman.net (lair.fifthhorseman.net [108.58.6.98]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-384) server-digest SHA384) (No client certificate requested) by che.mayfirst.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 87BE4F9AD for <xml2rfc@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 May 2022 11:36:32 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by fifthhorseman.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4C8C32040E; Thu, 12 May 2022 11:36:26 -0400 (EDT)
From: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
To: xml2rfc@ietf.org
Autocrypt: addr=dkg@fifthhorseman.net; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mDMEX+i03xYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdACA4xvL/xI5dHedcnkfViyq84doe8zFRid9jW7CC9XBiI0QQf FgoAgwWCX+i03wWJBZ+mAAMLCQcJEOCS6zpcoQ26RxQAAAAAAB4AIHNhbHRAbm90YXRpb25zLnNl cXVvaWEtcGdwLm9yZ/tr8E9NA10HvcAVlSxnox6z62KXCInWjZaiBIlgX6O5AxUKCAKbAQIeARYh BMKfigwB81402BaqXOCS6zpcoQ26AADZHQD/Zx9nc3N2kj13AUsKMr/7zekBtgfSIGB3hRCU74Su G44A/34Yp6IAkndewLxb1WdRSokycnaCVyrk0nb4imeAYyoPtBc8ZGtnQGZpZnRoaG9yc2VtYW4u bmV0PojRBBMWCgCDBYJf6LTfBYkFn6YAAwsJBwkQ4JLrOlyhDbpHFAAAAAAAHgAgc2FsdEBub3Rh dGlvbnMuc2VxdW9pYS1wZ3Aub3JnL0Gwxvypz2tu1IPG+yu1zPjkiZwpscsitwrVvzN3bbADFQoI ApsBAh4BFiEEwp+KDAHzXjTYFqpc4JLrOlyhDboAAPkXAP0Z29z7jW+YzLzPTQML4EQLMbkHOfU4 +s+ki81Czt0WqgD/SJ8RyrqDCtEP8+E4ZSR01ysKqh+MUAsTaJlzZjehiQ24MwRf6LTfFgkrBgEE AdpHDwEBB0DkKHOW2kmqfAK461+acQ49gc2Z6VoXMChRqobGP0ubb4kBiAQYFgoBOgWCX+i03wWJ BZ+mAAkQ4JLrOlyhDbpHFAAAAAAAHgAgc2FsdEBub3RhdGlvbnMuc2VxdW9pYS1wZ3Aub3Jnfvo+ nHoxDwaLaJD8XZuXiaqBNZtIGXIypF1udBBRoc0CmwICHgG+oAQZFgoAbwWCX+i03wkQPp1xc3He VlxHFAAAAAAAHgAgc2FsdEBub3RhdGlvbnMuc2VxdW9pYS1wZ3Aub3JnaheiqE7Pfi3Atb3GGTw+ jFcBGOaobgzEJrhEuFpXREEWIQQttUkcnfDcj0MoY88+nXFzcd5WXAAAvrsBAIJ5sBg8Udocv25N stN/zWOiYpnjjvOjVMLH4fV3pWE1AP9T6hzHz7hRnAA8d01vqoxOlQ3O6cb/kFYAjqx3oMXSBhYh BMKfigwB81402BaqXOCS6zpcoQ26AADX7gD/b83VObe14xrNP8xcltRrBZF5OE1rQSPkMNy+eWpk eCwA/1hxiS8ZxL5/elNjXiWuHXEvUGnRoVj745Vl48sZPVYMuDgEX+i03xIKKwYBBAGXVQEFAQEH QIGex1WZbH6xhUBve5mblScGYU+Y8QJOomXH+rr5tMsMAwEICYjJBBgWCgB7BYJf6LTfBYkFn6YA CRDgkus6XKENukcUAAAAAAAeACBzYWx0QG5vdGF0aW9ucy5zZXF1b2lhLXBncC5vcmcEAx9vTD3b J0SXkhvcRcCr6uIDJwic3KFKxkH1m4QW0QKbDAIeARYhBMKfigwB81402BaqXOCS6zpcoQ26AAAX mwD8CWmukxwskU82RZLMk5fm1wCgMB5z8dA50KLw3rgsCykBAKg1w/Y7XpBS3SlXEegIg1K1e6dR fRxL7Z37WZXoH8AH
Date: Thu, 12 May 2022 11:36:24 -0400
Message-ID: <87lev6hifb.fsf@fifthhorseman.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xml2rfc/lNfxTmujCXm9mp0c3on17uroyPQ>
Subject: [xml2rfc] future work: a <bcp26> element, by analogy with <bcp14>
X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: XML2RFC discussion list <xml2rfc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xml2rfc>, <mailto:xml2rfc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/xml2rfc/>
List-Post: <mailto:xml2rfc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xml2rfc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xml2rfc>, <mailto:xml2rfc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 May 2022 15:36:38 -0000

Hi xml2rfc folks--

Over on https://github.com/cabo/kramdown-rfc/issues/172 Carsten and i
were discussing the utility of markup for the IANA requirements like
"specification required", "expert review", etc that come from BCP 26.

It seems to me that this would work cleanly with a <bcp26> element, to
correspond to the <bcp14> element.

My understanding is that the RSWG would need to consider this, whenever
it gets under way.  It looks to me like the rswg mailing list isn't
working (https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rswg/ is empty), so I
thought i'd indicate interest here, in case anyone is considering what
sort of features to queue up for the rswg.

Regards,

        --dkg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email