[xml2rfc] Non IETF users of xml2rfc
Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Tue, 27 July 2021 22:13 UTC
Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C42F3A0B69 for <xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Jul 2021 15:13:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.079
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.079 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LWcu0amuR64L for <xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Jul 2021 15:13:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 191423A0B63 for <xml2rfc@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Jul 2021 15:13:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from unformal.localdomain ([47.186.34.206]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPSA id 16RMDVp3087726 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for <xml2rfc@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Jul 2021 17:13:32 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1627424012; bh=6CIZi4qaCa0L0vaBxG/ct19522agGS/obJNS308EiPU=; h=To:From:Subject:Date; b=p2QtyWeBrRFmSTT7uVtMUTaLiGG5oF1zOafhtksMqMuLGvb90Rqjdz4GLYD4QmSqc 7fWjXfzxkEggxEKX791WbNJ6pYHR5XogR6OhjUgZ8hDvEGcM5VtuFlqm/WFs565I5H XQbS+hOjGQeRAvmrhx1a6sS0de9QvxEiMw0FV1tc=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [47.186.34.206] claimed to be unformal.localdomain
To: xml2rfc@ietf.org
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <48cef789-44b7-8559-13bf-c44c4a0f67f3@nostrum.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2021 17:13:26 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.12.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xml2rfc/lrS60p8O4Z-bI61MMvPkFFodVBQ>
Subject: [xml2rfc] Non IETF users of xml2rfc
X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: XML2RFC discussion list <xml2rfc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xml2rfc>, <mailto:xml2rfc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/xml2rfc/>
List-Post: <mailto:xml2rfc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xml2rfc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xml2rfc>, <mailto:xml2rfc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2021 22:13:45 -0000
I have occasionally stumbled across other organizations using xml2rfc (no, I don't have a list at hand). I wonder if others have as well, or if there are people from those organizations on this list? If you know of such use, please let us know (send mail directly to me if you aren't comfortable posting on list). RjS
- [xml2rfc] Non IETF users of xml2rfc Robert Sparks
- Re: [xml2rfc] Non IETF users of xml2rfc Anders Rundgren
- Re: [xml2rfc] Non IETF users of xml2rfc Brian Campbell