Re: [xml2rfc] subsection failure

Robert Moskowitz <rgm@htt-consult.com> Thu, 23 April 2020 21:47 UTC

Return-Path: <rgm@htt-consult.com>
X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D802C3A1436 for <xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 14:47:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id T1qIE5n5Gboo for <xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 14:47:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from z9m9z.htt-consult.com (z9m9z.htt-consult.com [23.123.122.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DBEA43A0A54 for <xml2rfc@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 14:47:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by z9m9z.htt-consult.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD4076221B; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 17:47:24 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at htt-consult.com
Received: from z9m9z.htt-consult.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (z9m9z.htt-consult.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id Nhc+s5sR9mUS; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 17:47:22 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from lx140e.htt-consult.com (unknown [192.168.160.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by z9m9z.htt-consult.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CD3986216A; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 17:47:19 -0400 (EDT)
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Cc: XML2RFC Interest Group <xml2rfc@ietf.org>
References: <m21roedm1p.wl-randy@psg.com> <0e83776e-831a-1b9a-2a96-7026c0b25ee8@htt-consult.com> <m2pnbxdgwh.wl-randy@psg.com>
From: Robert Moskowitz <rgm@htt-consult.com>
Message-ID: <8784b823-b1eb-1920-0a89-f6e28d0966db@htt-consult.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 17:47:14 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <m2pnbxdgwh.wl-randy@psg.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xml2rfc/og_6XvTMMem3gKlCJsBJ3f-7-5M>
Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] subsection failure
X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <xml2rfc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xml2rfc>, <mailto:xml2rfc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/xml2rfc/>
List-Post: <mailto:xml2rfc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xml2rfc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xml2rfc>, <mailto:xml2rfc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 21:47:27 -0000


On 4/23/20 5:35 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
>> My experience is that you cannot have text for a section after a
>> subsection.
>>
>> It all must go before the subsection or be in its own subsection.
> yikes!

that was my feeling when I figured out i had to think about writing as:

2.

stuff

2.1

    more stuff

2.2

   more stuff

=============

there can be NO stuff of level 2 after the end of level 2.2

....

But I can kind of see it.  In that how can the reader, necessarily see 
that 2.2 above ended and the following text is back to 2?