IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [xmpp] 3921bis: probe to full JID?

Waqas Hussain <waqas20@gmail.com> Fri, 29 January 2010 22:07 UTC

Return-Path: <waqas20@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: xmpp@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xmpp@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86BC53A682E for <xmpp@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 14:07:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5n9FKKvhXVbg for <xmpp@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 14:07:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pz0-f174.google.com (mail-pz0-f174.google.com [209.85.222.174]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B579A3A6828 for <xmpp@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 14:07:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: by pzk4 with SMTP id 4so2004054pzk.32 for <xmpp@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 14:07:46 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=So5pTO5idCX4C1wpT2ydrwvybX1OAjBbXQxsu1bIg4E=; b=Vfl6WeNekdahM2vmATdynLfM3DCKotjcfAJGQLhXVmLZjs1op8vXy74oog+/cSA+PQ EWjowZF4hW/5zyuhqlow3ShKzZ3fF1BrP3fEnrJETNlhohgcxehEGIkL0nH4Z6sp2JlO ZiT1If/qzXpKXuSkDxtuh0fKMrahEtIDzpEqY=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=coT6aU4YqllGvBYnk7RG0t9plLw0XLSd0FfdCgLTJaHBx3ZYFv17KwJ95gOCZ+RYYy z6vcl672yTjqpozTcWwSn7gY26+hVZA5enflgwYE2R8YdGelofH3my8/dz1+M4DOfENH c33Q4SiUTFqb4HUuuhhpeeDqroiV5bUvzr6yM=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.140.251.5 with SMTP id y5mr928617rvh.121.1264802866075; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 14:07:46 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <4B63488A.8030706@stpeter.im>
References: <4B6217EC.7020909@stpeter.im> <201001282022.04890.justin@affinix.com> <868ea7d51001290309i68029a28hbce16a09fc848e43@mail.gmail.com> <201001291021.51677.justin@affinix.com> <4B63488A.8030706@stpeter.im>
From: Waqas Hussain <waqas20@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 03:07:26 +0500
Message-ID: <7fc4fa881001291407o3b0b4324l99a6dee5623a9b7e@mail.gmail.com>
To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000e0cd113088b1b43047e54dd79"
Cc: xmpp@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [xmpp] 3921bis: probe to full JID?
X-BeenThere: xmpp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: XMPP Working Group <xmpp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xmpp>, <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xmpp>
List-Post: <mailto:xmpp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xmpp>, <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 22:07:26 -0000

On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 1:43 AM, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>wrote:

>
> Hmm, it seems that version -03 of 3921bis already contained this text:
>
>   If a server receives a presence probe intended for a full JID
>   <contact@domain/resource>, it SHOULD handle it on behalf of the
>   connected resource by returning only the presence information for
>   that particular resource (and in any case MUST NOT deliver it to the
>   resource).
>
> I can't even read my own specs...


FWIW, I didn't remember that being there before this thread started until I
reread that section yesterday. I didn't point it out because I assumed it
was just me. I like that text :)

--
Waqas Hussain

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email