Re: [xmpp] Brian Haberman's Discuss on draft-ietf-xmpp-6122bis-23: (with DISCUSS)

Peter Saint-Andre - &yet <peter@andyet.net> Wed, 10 June 2015 19:28 UTC

Return-Path: <peter@andyet.net>
X-Original-To: xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56AFC1A8831 for <xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Jun 2015 12:28:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, J_CHICKENPOX_37=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id poHiywZoE_eb for <xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Jun 2015 12:28:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ig0-f179.google.com (mail-ig0-f179.google.com [209.85.213.179]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CEDEB1A882A for <xmpp@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Jun 2015 12:28:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by igbsb11 with SMTP id sb11so40667303igb.0 for <xmpp@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Jun 2015 12:28:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=lEcX0vQZiglLRSt17ba+nIPF6dwHmy21SZbbgcrxGsI=; b=iLgl2sTH9MuhdtqnWQX6doKxdKXPu3KBatxbIMtnT6YGQv7EdqjohHGMynEOrT7ps9 HjBtTrFhJvxNFfKtCBnwg5cgNAgPMp6hC45pXsHFDhEPZM+VvZse8WWj6fYHzlxNDtQL sqxibWKvllbXVSRrtvjxAqdXk6BEhDu7VSBwno6RA+CY+rIQdWyHNTjv8mhws1PLsmob FOZXRZWPdz9fq9R48XiJ6Zc34GXRNHrW17EjsKrz4lWEUW5PJCnCPYp6Va5ZbzkmD5B0 i1hmuRBr0tRmOZK0Wn/QutdoXI9RoEBJI/4SExD5NV1g7SLOStSIQlFky5VVRTqIow3L EVYw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm5WNUHebYwbxx8whY9Bjtg02vY8xSu8v3O+4Yl1cLLi9TnnVlfgyT53H1EVpnPmc3enqBr
X-Received: by 10.50.43.137 with SMTP id w9mr29831161igl.30.1433964530276; Wed, 10 Jun 2015 12:28:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aither.local ([2601:1:8200:3a60:89a0:20ab:ccd0:50f1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id 140sm6599089ion.16.2015.06.10.12.28.47 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 10 Jun 2015 12:28:48 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <55788FEF.4020505@andyet.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 13:28:47 -0600
From: Peter Saint-Andre - &yet <peter@andyet.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
References: <20150610142801.2677.38267.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <5578724E.10307@andyet.net> <557879F4.3020106@innovationslab.net> <55787CFC.4050701@andyet.net> <55788F9B.5080105@innovationslab.net>
In-Reply-To: <55788F9B.5080105@innovationslab.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xmpp/AksMYPafgWd-PW-vkrrHaC3nt9o>
Cc: xmpp-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-xmpp-6122bis.ad@ietf.org, xmpp@ietf.org, draft-ietf-xmpp-6122bis@ietf.org, draft-ietf-xmpp-6122bis.shepherd@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [xmpp] Brian Haberman's Discuss on draft-ietf-xmpp-6122bis-23: (with DISCUSS)
X-BeenThere: xmpp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: XMPP Working Group <xmpp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xmpp>, <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xmpp/>
List-Post: <mailto:xmpp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xmpp>, <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 19:28:52 -0000

On 6/10/15 1:27 PM, Brian Haberman wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> On 6/10/15 2:07 PM, Peter Saint-Andre - &yet wrote:
>
>>> I agree that a proper reference to 6874 would be useful.  Is there any
>>> need to mention the potential for a literal to include the zone id?
>>
>> How is this text?
>>
>> ###
>>
>>        domainpart   = IP-literal / IPv4address / ifqdn
>>                       ;
>>                       ; the "IPv4address" and "IP-literal" rules are
>>                       ; defined in RFC 3896 and RFC 6874 respectively,
>>                       ; and the first-match-wins (a.k.a. "greedy")
>>                       ; algorithm described in Appendix B of RFC 3986
>>                       ; applies to the matching process
>>
>> <snip/>
>>
>>        Implementation Note: Reuse of the IP-literal rule from [RFC6874]
>>        implies that IPv6 addresses are enclosed in square brackets (i.e.,
>>        beginning with '[' and ; ending with ']'), which was not the case
>>        with the definition of the XMPP address format in [RFC3920] but
>>        which was changed in [RFC6122].  Also note that the IP-literal
>>        rule was updated between RFC 3986 and RFC 6874 to optionally add a
>>        zone identifier to any literal address.
>>
>> ###
>>
>
> This all works for me.  Thanks for the quick response and turn around!

Great. I'll post a revised I-D after the telechat.

Peter