IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [xmpp] Consensus Call on draft-saintandre-xmpp-6122bis

Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> Fri, 28 October 2011 20:18 UTC

Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63B7811E8080 for <xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Oct 2011 13:18:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.052
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.052 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.548, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gG3wFamnVt82 for <xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Oct 2011 13:18:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (nostrum-pt.tunnel.tserv2.fmt.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f03:267::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D849511E807F for <xmpp@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Oct 2011 13:18:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dn3-53.estacado.net (vicuna-alt.estacado.net [75.53.54.121]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p9SKIpJR079925 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 28 Oct 2011 15:18:52 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <FC49BC43-717A-4EBC-BA81-F45C66C3A055@nostrum.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 15:18:50 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <CBAACF76-FBBD-4C69-8012-B8F0D8466CA4@nostrum.com>
References: <FC49BC43-717A-4EBC-BA81-F45C66C3A055@nostrum.com>
To: XMPP Group <xmpp@ietf.org>, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1251.1)
Received-SPF: pass (nostrum.com: 75.53.54.121 is authenticated by a trusted mechanism)
Subject: Re: [xmpp] Consensus Call on draft-saintandre-xmpp-6122bis
X-BeenThere: xmpp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: XMPP Working Group <xmpp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xmpp>, <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xmpp>
List-Post: <mailto:xmpp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xmpp>, <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 20:18:53 -0000

Hi Everyone,

Given that all the feedback has been positive,  it looks like we have a working group consensus to adopt.

Peter, please resubmit the draft with a "draft-ietf-xmpp-*" name at your convenience once the 00 draft embargo is over.

Thanks!

Ben.

On Oct 20, 2011, at 5:22 PM, Ben Campbell wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> PRECIS work group recently accepted the framework document (formerly draft-blanchet-precis-framework-03) as a work group item (now draft-ietf-precis-framework).
> 
> XMPP has a charter milestone to "Define a solution for internationalization of XMPP addresses (Update of RFC 6122)". With that in mind, Peter has been working on draft-saintandre-xmpp-6122bis, which depends heavily on the PRECIS framework draft.
> 
> Should the XMPP work group accept draft-saintandres-xmpp-6122bis-02 as a work group item in support of that milestone? Keep in mind that acceptance does not mean the work group thinks the draft is correct or complete. It merely means that we think that the draft is a good start towards the milestone.
> 
> Please send your opinions to the XMPP list no later than Thursday, October 27.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Ben.
> _______________________________________________
> xmpp mailing list
> xmpp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xmpp

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email