[xmpp] WebSocket open/close
Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Mon, 02 December 2013 22:42 UTC
Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 758351AD845 for <xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 14:42:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.903
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.903 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zfjbafRY3hkl for <xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 14:42:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B00551ADDAF for <xmpp@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 14:42:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ergon.local (unknown [64.101.72.104]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C3F3F4032A; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 15:42:00 -0700 (MST)
Message-ID: <529D0CB7.2090203@stpeter.im>
Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2013 15:41:59 -0700
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: XMPP <xmpp@ietf.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [xmpp] WebSocket open/close
X-BeenThere: xmpp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: XMPP Working Group <xmpp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xmpp>, <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xmpp/>
List-Post: <mailto:xmpp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xmpp>, <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2013 22:42:05 -0000
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 As far as I can see, we didn't have agreement in the room at IETF 88 about the framing for stream open and close. Based on informal, offlist discussion since then, it seems that most current implementations send the RFC 6120 <stream:stream> and </stream:stream> tags, and don't use something like specialized <open> and <close> elements. Unless folks on this list have concerns about the first approach, personally I'd be comfortable going with the running code. What do others think? Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.19 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJSnQy3AAoJEOoGpJErxa2pl8AP/1ojqiMTD1i1/OEbMVZuGzEi NbQjhqAujLKjPRxEBko5iQ2n2hpfbSIqrX1ZUm31kdQnc5GggQJFQuvvw4B1Afj5 yrfEmHgeCfIRkvsPV39B/tihXCW5ozqQNy0bE/HpOqBSeSyPHOljQydYRu7o21Ad st5hf/3BYpZb6VHUsBgtWV1gooKLpeWKDMOjHclnVaYHd6jOWPqKzHa4R2EmnRSB JLqUjjjkm9Zxp5e2XRJQKxk/LPgr34cj8VXZf7yiKPd1eXSwdwEhwy3ESVG51cjL 5L1j2wxCy8ZcrB9CUmiNXAWzwQQrDkUWCQsf4+VqwCedZV3xBvzncKtMxrXuBvz8 pzYbBXHnH6ZKBvhkTrlFsMidlk2DDwsVTjQpZkjwWuo4euc9W77s9QhoNWEH6fwB QV0FJ6V+I5x+H7OscjJwdoe5+zAmhSkZUtCzqfddMUu+o33AGaJtjvUaZeojFzB4 x1nBVZCpXrs0vlXParekBzOZICQ810c6nlLTXRjbHNjQl23YASdj/f4vnHCKsKPN D5ilMlR4Zc5aqY9B3pvFrXuNDnBRnol/hpn5uHkp++Bp4uwRDikBT6EAFjBDN1xO C7MBlvdtGEFGqv7ykWrGjQ1OYwqtk1jrjEXYxfEov7h1e0F1YL6pfLHAd6uA5NhP Sjuwgtedh8Pk5LQbn1aJ =ncWw -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- [xmpp] WebSocket open/close Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [xmpp] WebSocket open/close Jack Moffitt
- Re: [xmpp] WebSocket open/close Peter Saint-Andre