IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [xmpp] Adoption of draft-saintandre-xmpp-dna as a work group item

Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> Sat, 06 April 2013 22:58 UTC

Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2CDB21F87C5 for <xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 6 Apr 2013 15:58:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8QJqo1IZsnHC for <xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 6 Apr 2013 15:58:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shaman.nostrum.com (nostrum-pt.tunnel.tserv2.fmt.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f03:267::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6602221F87B7 for <xmpp@ietf.org>; Sat, 6 Apr 2013 15:57:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.12] (cpe-76-187-92-156.tx.res.rr.com [76.187.92.156]) (authenticated bits=0) by shaman.nostrum.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id r36MvvrK004823 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for <xmpp@ietf.org>; Sat, 6 Apr 2013 17:57:58 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.3 \(1503\))
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <52FFD20C-D8BD-4750-8313-CDCA2894F7F1@nostrum.com>
Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2013 17:57:59 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <98100AA4-8FA1-41E8-9636-6CCAB0AAA3B7@nostrum.com>
References: <52FFD20C-D8BD-4750-8313-CDCA2894F7F1@nostrum.com>
To: XMPP <xmpp@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1503)
Received-SPF: pass (shaman.nostrum.com: 76.187.92.156 is authenticated by a trusted mechanism)
Subject: Re: [xmpp] Adoption of draft-saintandre-xmpp-dna as a work group item
X-BeenThere: xmpp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: XMPP Working Group <xmpp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xmpp>, <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xmpp>
List-Post: <mailto:xmpp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xmpp>, <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2013 22:58:01 -0000

Hi,

I received no responses to this consensus call.

Normally, I would take this as a sign of disinterest. But I've spoken to a number of people who support this, and I think we had support in the room in Orlando. That being said, the official decision lies with the working group list.

So I'm extending the consensus for another week. Please send comments, including "I support adoption" or "I do not support adoption" to the working group list no later than Friday, 12 April.

Thanks!

Ben.

On Apr 2, 2013, at 5:36 PM, Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> This is a short consensus call on the adoption of draft-saintandre-xmpp-dna as a working group draft for our "server-to-server connection reuse" milestone. If we do so, this will replace the existing draft-ietf-xmpp-dna. (probably by becoming draft-ietf-xmpp-dna-02.)
> 
> Please note that this adoption is independent from any potential adoption of draft-miller-xmpp-posh-prooftype or draft-miller-xmpp-dnssec-prooftype. We are still exploring where the work from those drafts should land.
> 
> Please send yea/nay or other related comments to the XMPP list by the end of this week.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Ben.
> _______________________________________________
> xmpp mailing list
> xmpp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xmpp

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email