[xmpp] <optional> and <required/>
Kim Alvefur <zash@zash.se> Wed, 09 March 2011 02:46 UTC
Return-Path: <zash@zash.se>
X-Original-To: xmpp@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xmpp@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1C1F3A680C for <xmpp@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Mar 2011 18:46:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r1r0rYGq7dtj for <xmpp@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Mar 2011 18:46:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.zash.se (zash-2-pt.tunnel.tserv24.sto1.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:27:58d::2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C57163A6802 for <xmpp@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Mar 2011 18:46:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.65.100.10] (unknown [10.65.100.10]) by mail.zash.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36A621B373 for <xmpp@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Mar 2011 03:47:22 +0100 (CET)
From: Kim Alvefur <zash@zash.se>
To: xmpp@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-QOF7mSPaZUvsmY9gqGTz"
Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2011 03:47:23 +0100
Message-ID: <1299638843.18776.76.camel@spinachia>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.1
Subject: [xmpp] <optional> and <required/>
X-BeenThere: xmpp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: XMPP Working Group <xmpp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xmpp>, <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xmpp>
List-Post: <mailto:xmpp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xmpp>, <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2011 02:50:52 -0000
Hi! Just to point out that these sections[1][2] seems to conflict with this tread[3]. Otherwise, how does it make sense for roster versioning to be required? [1]: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-xmpp-3920bis-22#section-4.9.3.23 [2]: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-xmpp-3921bis-20#section-2.6.1 [3]: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xmpp/current/msg01125.html -- Kim Alvefur <zash@zash.se>
- [xmpp] <optional> and <required/> Kim Alvefur
- Re: [xmpp] <optional> and <required/> Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [xmpp] <optional> and <required/> Waqas Hussain
- Re: [xmpp] <optional> and <required/> Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [xmpp] <optional> and <required/> Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [xmpp] <optional> and <required/> Waqas Hussain