Re: [xmpp] address format

Waqas Hussain <waqas20@gmail.com> Tue, 17 May 2011 16:52 UTC

Return-Path: <waqas20@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C261CE0720 for <xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 May 2011 09:52:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qOPRPsk5L2xt for <xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 May 2011 09:52:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-gw0-f44.google.com (mail-gw0-f44.google.com [74.125.83.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6BEAE071C for <xmpp@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 May 2011 09:52:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by gwb20 with SMTP id 20so275963gwb.31 for <xmpp@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 May 2011 09:52:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=W9m9ggbGm8a/6fDUC3Nd4nDTxqqyX3Ilha9hzguAC0I=; b=IenEW5Kq+cIfM81jMmzBLFaoDZB9tCjx/mnAjfocbe5+5oG3+d5NwUPWtXNeknS45W aQwGbWj2EEc+m5c6HE1B9odEVos1TH18fZBJ4u7qvwX4w3ghuhSoiq5IicDRHNR9/rE/ 7b0RiZDmjkLe4e8NMjOJMm1v9uZuMQGJNeg3E=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=ZMaUWcVcgm9OFl9+DfMU/FPO5W9xhNs4DoQvW1peBVYmglv+bcKiBZPCkD2loiX0w6 WVgTeBIN82XHf/73WlPq0+0OSXYd0DhLjH1rx6G9IaVx+5LwWy5rLPXyEbbWBs4syw0S 2dRxHYu6KAYnd5AYV1YRknnzJTGvCWRrlSdyM=
Received: by 10.150.197.19 with SMTP id u19mr634207ybf.327.1305651132132; Tue, 17 May 2011 09:52:12 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.151.108.2 with HTTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 09:51:52 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4DD2A409.70504@stpeter.im>
References: <4DD2A409.70504@stpeter.im>
From: Waqas Hussain <waqas20@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 21:51:52 +0500
Message-ID: <BANLkTikNx=0Ei+E-JaCx+JgmssS6Mquz1Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: XMPP <xmpp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [xmpp] address format
X-BeenThere: xmpp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: XMPP Working Group <xmpp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xmpp>, <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xmpp>
List-Post: <mailto:xmpp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xmpp>, <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 16:52:13 -0000

On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 9:36 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> wrote:
> Folks, I've finally made the time to write two documents that hopefully
> will move us forward with regard to the XMPP address format:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-blanchet-precis-framework/
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-saintandre-xmpp-6122bis/
>

For anyone interested in reviewing the changes, side-by-side diff
against RFC6122:
http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-saintandre-xmpp-6122bis-00.txt