Re: [xmpp] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-miller-xmpp-dnssec-prooftype-01.txt
Matt Miller <mamille2@cisco.com> Wed, 27 June 2012 16:19 UTC
Return-Path: <mamille2@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D95A221F8741 for <xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 09:19:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pQhKaTofAEdk for <xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 09:19:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mtv-iport-3.cisco.com (mtv-iport-3.cisco.com [173.36.130.14]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D338421F86F2 for <xmpp@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 09:19:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=mamille2@cisco.com; l=5443; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1340813980; x=1342023580; h=subject:mime-version:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id: references:to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ps+9ni176eWmm9T2B1Jtbs0530fO4n+XOhh0mQnTN1I=; b=equdaXhMc/evuIrsn1QEimafRBJm6dpRQ6yh6xLm4ZmEr+J5Dcn6W+bE jIZcOoduyrtWBevGh+KtltSUam+n7g93ExsnASNLNWz8NZhqlH1eoKKaX t5NSrh2W6Yr2uazSpaAJVRTm+LrblBcjGjcdzVTBzUA8c+TevCb2jXtl5 E=;
X-Files: smime.p7s, PGP.sig : 2214, 535
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EAEsy60+rRDoJ/2dsb2JhbABFtimBB4IYAQEBAwESAWYFCwsOOAJVBhMih2QEmTSgR4s3hSpgA4hKhX2Ga44dgWaCfg
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.77,483,1336348800"; d="sig'?p7s'?scan'208"; a="47792346"
Received: from mtv-core-4.cisco.com ([171.68.58.9]) by mtv-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 27 Jun 2012 16:19:40 +0000
Received: from sjc-vpn7-1229.cisco.com (sjc-vpn7-1229.cisco.com [10.21.148.205]) by mtv-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5RGJeEJ008568; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 16:19:40 GMT
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; boundary="Apple-Mail-4--417957128"
From: Matt Miller <mamille2@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.10.1206271649070.17671@lo.psyced.org>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 10:19:39 -0600
Message-Id: <4975B6EA-000B-4C23-9D8F-47184E5BC126@cisco.com>
References: <20120608202212.8859.65155.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <A14A8C98-F762-4C96-9895-50DB6DFEF973@cisco.com> <alpine.DEB.1.10.1206271649070.17671@lo.psyced.org>
To: Philipp Hancke <fippo@goodadvice.pages.de>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 1.3.3
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Cc: XMPP Working Group <xmpp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [xmpp] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-miller-xmpp-dnssec-prooftype-01.txt
X-BeenThere: xmpp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: XMPP Working Group <xmpp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xmpp>, <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xmpp>
List-Post: <mailto:xmpp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xmpp>, <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 16:19:42 -0000
On Jun 27, 2012, at 09:16, Philipp Hancke wrote: > i'm pondering on the proof name. The prooftype is using dnssec, but uses it to extend the 6125 to allow secure delegation. > I.e. it either explains how to do delegation within a PKI prooftype or is a proof PKI-Delegation proof. > > DNSSEC alone might (mostly in the context of s2s and server dialback) be a different proof (used by the connecting server instead of dialbacks current faith in insecure dns). > First; Peter and I will be submitting a new DNA (Domain Name Associations) draft soon, which defines a few terms like "prooftype", "delegation method", and "assertion mechanism". The goal is to have it published before the end of the week, so stay tuned! I don't think if DNSSEC in and of itself is really a proof; it's not providing verification material directly. I do think it is a delegation method, which then makes dialback keys a worthwhile prooftype! - m&m Matt Miller - <mamille2@cisco.com> Cisco Systems, Inc.
- [xmpp] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-miller-xmpp-dnssec-… Matt Miller
- Re: [xmpp] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-miller-xmpp-dns… Matt Miller
- Re: [xmpp] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-miller-xmpp-dns… Philipp Hancke
- Re: [xmpp] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-miller-xmpp-dns… Philipp Hancke