[xmpp] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6120 (4228)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Sat, 10 January 2015 19:31 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFF991A870C for <xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 10 Jan 2015 11:31:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.912
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OVHUmJ8yfrRY for <xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 10 Jan 2015 11:31:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1900:3001:11::31]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E109F1A700D for <xmpp@ietf.org>; Sat, 10 Jan 2015 11:31:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id AF0E318008C; Sat, 10 Jan 2015 11:31:21 -0800 (PST)
To: ietf@stpeter.im, rlb@ipv.sx, alissa@cooperw.in, jhildebr@cisco.com, ben@nostrum.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 6000:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20150110193121.AF0E318008C@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2015 11:31:21 -0800
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xmpp/dbd-XpTFL4vVwWgfUXv0IiiXrYI>
Cc: mail@georg.so, xmpp@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [xmpp] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6120 (4228)
X-BeenThere: xmpp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: XMPP Working Group <xmpp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xmpp>, <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xmpp/>
List-Post: <mailto:xmpp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xmpp>, <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2015 19:31:59 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6120, "Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol (XMPP): Core". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6120&eid=4228 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: Georg Sauthoff <mail@georg.so> Section: A.6. Original Text ------------- <xs:element name='subject'> <xs:complexType> <xs:simpleContent> <xs:extension base='xs:string'> <xs:attribute ref='xml:lang' use='optional'/> </xs:extension> </xs:simpleContent> </xs:complexType> </xs:element> <xs:element name='thread'> <xs:complexType> <xs:simpleContent> <xs:extension base='xs:NMTOKEN'> <xs:attribute name='parent' type='xs:NMTOKEN' use='optional'/> </xs:extension> </xs:simpleContent> </xs:complexType> </xs:element> Saint-Andre Standards Track [Page 202] RFC 6120 XMPP Core March 2011 <xs:element name='subject'> <xs:complexType> <xs:simpleContent> <xs:extension base='xs:NMTOKEN'> <xs:attribute name='parent' type='xs:NMTOKEN' use='optional'/> </xs:extension> </xs:simpleContent> </xs:complexType> </xs:element> Corrected Text -------------- <xs:element name='subject'> <xs:complexType> <xs:simpleContent> <xs:extension base='xs:string'> <xs:attribute ref='xml:lang' use='optional'/> </xs:extension> </xs:simpleContent> </xs:complexType> </xs:element> <xs:element name='thread'> <xs:complexType> <xs:simpleContent> <xs:extension base='xs:NMTOKEN'> <xs:attribute name='parent' type='xs:NMTOKEN' use='optional'/> </xs:extension> </xs:simpleContent> </xs:complexType> </xs:element> Saint-Andre Standards Track [Page 202] RFC 6120 XMPP Core March 2011 Notes ----- The issue is that the definition of the referenced element 'subject' is duplicated. This can be easily tested via a command like: $ xmllint --schema XMLSchema_1.1.xsd server.xsd --noout server.xsd:84: element element: Schemas validity error : Element '{http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema}element': Duplicate key-sequence ['subject'] in key identity-constraint '{http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema}element'. server.xsd fails to validate The corrected text contains one possible edit how to make the XSD of the server namespace valid again. Of course, another possibility would be to remove the first definition of the 'subject' element. I've eliminated the second definition because the first one equals the one from section A.5. (Client Namespace). Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC6120 (draft-ietf-xmpp-3920bis-22) -------------------------------------- Title : Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol (XMPP): Core Publication Date : March 2011 Author(s) : P. Saint-Andre Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol Area : Real-time Applications and Infrastructure Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [xmpp] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6120 (4228) RFC Errata System