Re: [xmpp] service name registration (was: Fwd: Re: [apps-discuss] [port-srv-reg] New Version Notification for draft-gudmundsson-dnsext-srv-clarify-00)

On Jul 1, 2010, at 11:54 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:

> This still seems to be an open issue for 3920bis.
> 
> /psa

 Is draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-06 actually in WGLC? The latest mention I can find on TSVWG is http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tsvwg/current/msg10060.html

Is every draft that registers services blocking on this?

> 
> 
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] [port-srv-reg] New Version Notification	for
> draft-gudmundsson-dnsext-srv-clarify-00
> Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2010 10:52:19 -0600
> From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
> To: Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>
> CC: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>, Alfred � <ah@TR-Sys.de>,
> tsvwg@ietf.org, apps-discuss@ietf.org, namedroppers@ops.ietf.org,
> draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports@tools.IETF.ORG
> 
> A point of clarification...
> 
> On 6/30/10 4:01 PM, Joe Touch wrote:
> 
>> "xmpp" is does not have an Assigned Number, and is not being used 'locally', and
>> was never registered with the SRV registry either. Yes, there appear to be a few
>> other uses of SRV records other than for the kind of services indicated in the
>> IANA ports tale or the SRV registry.
> 
> XMPP does have two registered ports (5222 and 5269) but the XMPP WG has
> been waiting for the service registry issue to be settled before adding
> the appropriate service name registration to the IANA considerations for
> draft-ietf-xmpp-3920bis, which is currently in WGLC.
> 
> See for instance:
> 
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xmpp/current/msg00313.html
> 
> Peter
> 
> -- 
> Peter Saint-Andre
> https://stpeter.im/
> 
> 
> 
> <Attached Message Part.txt>_______________________________________________
> xmpp mailing list
> xmpp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xmpp