IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [xmpp] Position Paper on Strengthening XMPP

Dave Cridland <dave@cridland.net> Wed, 15 January 2014 20:15 UTC

Return-Path: <dave@cridland.net>
X-Original-To: xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1AB61AE1CE for <xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Jan 2014 12:15:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.378
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.378 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iE2UPB5n43uB for <xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Jan 2014 12:15:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ob0-x22f.google.com (mail-ob0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 448A61AE153 for <xmpp@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Jan 2014 12:15:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ob0-f175.google.com with SMTP id uz6so1709115obc.20 for <xmpp@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Jan 2014 12:15:03 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cridland.net; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=XapQl9uTIp4wlVOXNAlOd36hfiKgrMFhYwOiTDd5I10=; b=h2yXH5RCmbdMMLlJjeLv7BqwLBguR3tau9/XB5rmqa9UtFRqf1stw09Iw5GCIXUmPG 7/i0EyCsNIqYxELvOGmYYxE5VPQITnmlWrc0ruT9S1Ho0JiJFbYQ8tiYV04htSmP+qiB J1AOAsdzRd+tOzTOUDOTuJx0AW/9pkk6diCjY=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=XapQl9uTIp4wlVOXNAlOd36hfiKgrMFhYwOiTDd5I10=; b=aQcf138ZvoOnDegZGdGKwrvCBXnZBrugSwDbozJ23sCCFguPDE6oVvQ1ebLk2mX3o1 4y7eKJB5X2TKqkWXXJ5iPcYspyx8SYAWCK9T3nqE3MLL8yaRHYkKzlBCZDY8NbDBL8AA qgV8ozVR5TigQf6mGAvNyXqJFgMq0yRa5do+WQHQ9VDKu+JjMtXIcMZan92iSMTV84s3 +O6CVJwqEKqTq6nBfWHd9lylWqpoETd/xw7MKpBVtnk4ZEI0e72xRoNYGu/0SzWI8kp5 418W6u0nhK3G9OiEBRW28vE1aWDFv2PJ9nMGBYge57F8kkVuYSvZewDrAd7qlA1HZ7Ph hjbg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnRr7Jqf/2zRZC8r0VPNBrL3ZorHKEttDWsGCkbWiy7n46bOq3UN69jC/xrRgPF4IX/dY7i
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.228.135 with SMTP id si7mr3419426oec.4.1389816903278; Wed, 15 Jan 2014 12:15:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.60.55.138 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Jan 2014 12:15:03 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <52D6D846.7060607@stpeter.im>
References: <52D6D846.7060607@stpeter.im>
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 20:15:03 +0000
Message-ID: <CAKHUCzx_9aPL38iyKyjCtg4yfW6EO-4FzETud3OkZev2uGSahQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dave Cridland <dave@cridland.net>
To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11363910d2b9ad04f007f64c"
Cc: XMPP <xmpp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [xmpp] Position Paper on Strengthening XMPP
X-BeenThere: xmpp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: XMPP Working Group <xmpp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xmpp>, <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xmpp/>
List-Post: <mailto:xmpp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xmpp>, <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 20:15:20 -0000

Is this somewhere in XML form? I'll wordsmith a patch.

It'd be interesting to discuss the (now ancient history) of C2S security
pushes, I suspect.


On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 6:49 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I have submitted an initial version of a position paper about
> strengthening XMPP for the W3C/IAB workshop to be held before IETF 89:
>
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-saintandre-strint-workshop-xmpp/
>
> https://www.w3.org/2014/strint/
>
> The document is a bit of a stub, so I would love to receive some
> feedback in the next 48 hours. I'll then submit a revised I-D for
> formal consideration by the workshop committee.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Peter
>
> - --
> Peter Saint-Andre
> https://stpeter.im/
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.19 (Darwin)
> Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
>
> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJS1thGAAoJEOoGpJErxa2pLvwP/220ahT+W4lhJWzSrPEGHuef
> HFh7DSSSNfUTO+8JD/NlRsCGWBg5Uz2vIXoRRahXAiCa1T0YFk9T5tsAO9488tWq
> lgCfhjtUVq8fEzEHvS0w7c9TSlKVUGMH29Q4gLlFwlkCqsFSCJvYsZ86+I+fgnPX
> jAtf7k9BJD9CMxzf7LDbdx0nBvqPc0SRgYZFjnGGHpr0gOWmPOZf+gbFa6uCJYsJ
> lniYlwwE5r+bxE5orhTgDwZoAkyua829Yqq4NZkiwpWMDZRq/+bSbpZgjuf/MECo
> SCB9iQQz3phzZ7fKFdvSnNWUM31AwBFZHIX0eOzuTP9HCAT6tnCsTx/CMc8oUXVp
> mpoekm2ed6N+DGmZrgBWn3AjSxXCX80o7xKBDVtmgtg5oYQI2hw+qcv9w3JmMqHA
> QbzaDwXDLLAfG+vCKucgOwLctYrPmopcnbxz2bxaOkA29trRYYzIq/8Uhn3n8muT
> 1i+igp5Fr6cCQ3qZ2ojim91rCWSrDYHgz19lOMtZ+zm7+w78dQpZzZx8QqAWQCk6
> uB+NBNdr5ysI7wpq2v9XRHy3cBiGZMBUQlOv0qbw9ChML4iFzJs+8IX4BJpsexyI
> i0XgzuPMkMOUlXpavFwUya7spPSXggQREhf9q3MXWW+DcGNtEl0k6gIpaCTyQXe2
> d+moDu+bxZveMn1ZMD9T
> =w7rg
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> _______________________________________________
> xmpp mailing list
> xmpp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xmpp
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email