Re: [xmpp] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-chen-xmpp-pubsub-extension-00.txt

[Dave Cridland <[e-mail]>]

On Fri Jul 15 05:20:49 2011, ChenGang wrote:
> I agree that is a way to advance such works in XSF.
> The original motivation to put this effort in IETF is we would like  
> to
> implement XMPP-based solution conforming to RFC6120.
> We are not targeting to deploy pure XMPP pubsub solution. A  
> lightweight &
> XMPP CORE compatible solution is more preferred.
> So, I think that is helpful to get comments from IETF community.

Well, first off, I have to say you should be considering some form of  
XEP-0060, even if it's a fairly lightweight profile. The deployment  
of PEP has basically proven that model works.

Secondly, I think you're after the same kind of technical solution as  
google:queue (and I hear there's other forms of that deployed as  
well).

I've a XEP written up for google:queue; I should really polish this  
off and submit.

Then we can use that as the basis for a standards-based, more  
rigorous solution.

You'd be more than welcome to join that effort, both the XSF and IETF  
constantly lack mobile expertise.

Dave
-- 
Dave Cridland - mailto:[e-mail] - xmpp:[e-mail]
  - acap://acap.dave.cridland.net/byowner/user/dwd/bookmarks/
  - http://dave.cridland.net/
Infotrope Polymer - ACAP, IMAP, ESMTP, and Lemonade