Re: [xrblock] xrblock meeting at IETF 95?

Varun Singh <vsingh.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 11 January 2016 15:35 UTC

Return-Path: <vsingh.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A85D1A1A67 for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Jan 2016 07:35:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8syD95BMjW0N for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Jan 2016 07:35:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lf0-x235.google.com (mail-lf0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6DE321A1A45 for <xrblock@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Jan 2016 07:35:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lf0-x235.google.com with SMTP id h129so20267263lfh.3 for <xrblock@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Jan 2016 07:35:26 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=FwbdRBh85Zx+rcBZpWwbTeqjtK8iqACVB0p/Fo6yNkI=; b=zBbTMfwUp3MuhUn70DmXNnD+p3RdwzZUO5ZggA6eZYzaXiQWW6LJgXOfysAaMkOnoz +x9PtdFnQbjYALikS8taZg1UGr97ESu9tbx4Te5csSVsgJRwB4Fk4g6TZ4s+LCLY/sTj 8NfqtHm9emzj2o2g81WvG02dHKRoUFKp0U/+kcorpSEJPQ7KXvwbNSpchbL0x0sO8PIu oE5SZdcZk3BoUUT2la+/+5I+oVTQnEufb/+M4DOBx0cdceA+KSGvn4i19FgHvXXWRaSL iZV5JCSuRKTvSNx+4SeEMYvl2Kcr4PXaHjqiAv6kq/dq5wMlw7bY18i3672c1A8+x2iM zjNA==
X-Received: by 10.25.213.3 with SMTP id m3mr6865902lfg.125.1452526524566; Mon, 11 Jan 2016 07:35:24 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.25.142.195 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Jan 2016 07:35:04 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA6BEE427C@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com>
References: <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA6BEE427C@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com>
From: Varun Singh <vsingh.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 17:35:04 +0200
Message-ID: <CAEbPqrxjGCY7HnQedZtW_1C0XZpc3pOOJevcMOHOie_P5fE+cQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xrblock/0sDgbigpWhpXDyzUEe5F73U9KII>
Cc: "xrblock@ietf.org" <xrblock@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [xrblock] xrblock meeting at IETF 95?
X-BeenThere: xrblock@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Metric Blocks for use with RTCP's Extended Report Framework working group discussion list <xrblock.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/xrblock/>
List-Post: <mailto:xrblock@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 15:35:28 -0000

We had an open issue about sending a statement to the W3C about our
work on xrmetrics. Perhaps based on the feedback we might need a
session?

Regards,
Varun

On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 12:23 PM, Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
<dromasca@avaya.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> Should we meet at IETF 95?
>
>
>
> Current status:
>
>
>
> -          draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-video-lc is in IESG review, was
> discussed in the last IESG telechat and is now in AD follow-up. We are
> waiting for clarifications from Rachel’s colleagues on the IPR issue
>
> -          draft-ietf-xrblock-independent-burst-gap-discard completed WGLC,
> we still wait for the PMON review before issuing a revised version
>
> -          draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcweb-rtcp-xr-metrics will soon go to WGLC
>
> -          there are no independent submissions on the pipe
>
>
>
> Folks who believe that we need a one hour meeting at IETF 95 – please say
> so. Silence means that you believe that issues can be solved on the mail
> list and we do not need a meeting.
>
>
>
> Thanks and Regards,
>
>
>
> Dan
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> xrblock mailing list
> xrblock@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock
>



-- 
http://www.callstats.io