IETF Logo Mail Archive

[xrblock] 答复: FW: New Version Notification for draft-singh-xrblock-webrtc-additional-stats-00.txt

Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com> Sat, 02 November 2013 21:41 UTC

Return-Path: <bill.wu@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45B5E21E80B7 for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 2 Nov 2013 14:41:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.314
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.314 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-4.102, BAYES_00=-2.599, CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADER=3.2, CN_BODY_35=0.339, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, SARE_SUB_ENC_GB2312=1.345]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UXweZG3o+5g4 for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 2 Nov 2013 14:41:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C635211E8241 for <xrblock@ietf.org>; Sat, 2 Nov 2013 14:41:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id AXM23630; Sat, 02 Nov 2013 21:41:18 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LHREML403-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.217) by lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com (172.18.7.223) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Sat, 2 Nov 2013 21:40:49 +0000
Received: from NKGEML403-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.34) by lhreml403-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.217) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Sat, 2 Nov 2013 21:41:17 +0000
Received: from NKGEML501-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.2.75]) by nkgeml403-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.34]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Sun, 3 Nov 2013 05:41:11 +0800
From: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>
To: Varun Singh <vsingh.ietf@gmail.com>, "xrblock@ietf.org" <xrblock@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [xrblock] FW: New Version Notification for draft-singh-xrblock-webrtc-additional-stats-00.txt
Thread-Index: AQHOxZQQdTOq6LNQnkq90fFpzVk18poSnRyg
Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2013 21:41:11 +0000
Message-ID: <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA43C33669@nkgeml501-mbs.china.huawei.com>
References: <CAEbPqrw6Ypc=Rtgx9_CGC21tfha3RSHxthPuPww8hmMhCo-F6A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAEbPqrw6Ypc=Rtgx9_CGC21tfha3RSHxthPuPww8hmMhCo-F6A@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.47.152.63]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Subject: [xrblock] 答复: FW: New Version Notification for draft-singh-xrblock-webrtc-additional-stats-00.txt
X-BeenThere: xrblock@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Metric Blocks for use with RTCP's Extended Report Framework working group discussion list <xrblock.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xrblock>
List-Post: <mailto:xrblock@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2013 21:41:29 -0000

What the progress of RTCweb Web API is?
How this work get in line with Web API work?

Regards!
-Qin
-----邮件原件-----
发件人: xrblock-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:xrblock-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Varun Singh
发送时间: 2013年10月10日 16:38
收件人: xrblock@ietf.org
主题: [xrblock] FW: New Version Notification for draft-singh-xrblock-webrtc-additional-stats-00.txt

Hi all,

We've submitted a new draft to meet the requirement #F38 stated in
(http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-and-requirements-10)

This draft lists XRBlock metrics that should be added to the IANA registry of WebRTC's statistics API (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-alvestrand-rtcweb-stats-registry-00).
We would like the WG to discuss if these metrics along with the ones in the stats-registry are sufficient to meet req #F38.

This document is a proposal made out of the earlier draft discussing XR Metrics, http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-huang-xrblock-rtcweb-rtcp-xr-metrics-01.


A new version of I-D, draft-singh-xrblock-webrtc-additional-stats-00.txt
has been successfully submitted by Varun Singh and posted to the IETF repository.

Filename: draft-singh-xrblock-webrtc-additional-stats
Revision: 00
Title: Additional RTP Control Protocol (RTCP) Extended Report (XR) Metrics for WebRTC Statistics API Creation date: 2013-10-10
Group: Individual Submission
Number of pages: 7
URL:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-singh-xrblock-webrtc-additional-stats-00.txt
Status:
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-singh-xrblock-webrtc-additional-stats
Htmlized:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-singh-xrblock-webrtc-additional-stats-00



Abstract:
  This document describes a list additional identifiers used in
  WebRTC's Javascript statistics API.  These identifiers are a set of
  RTCP XR metrics related to the transport of multimedia flows.


Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.


The IETF Secretariat
_______________________________________________
xrblock mailing list
xrblock@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email