Re: [xrblock] Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-video-lc-04

Varun Singh <vsingh.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 05 November 2015 01:48 UTC

Return-Path: <vsingh.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B3871B3608 for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Nov 2015 17:48:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 85Fuuhke-FUo for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Nov 2015 17:48:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io0-x22e.google.com (mail-io0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0EE461B3651 for <xrblock@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Nov 2015 17:48:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: by iodd200 with SMTP id d200so74638244iod.0 for <xrblock@ietf.org>; Wed, 04 Nov 2015 17:48:01 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=P4P0d7lMz2SXHHM2j7csTYgU35tgDtxBv7YqOJ4jGAU=; b=j3ycS2SUk+pRuoz7zeYMbGcPBP91KIUStWbK58UE/8D2GKCDcV47hG5Kvljhs3jHA3 qWvGuwx9Yv+PftZ5kosmoJg0POEs0G7aKP/eL3RBBqFGKRm16nKd7Qn+/fAAoGXwo0Al SpjjlPnK/2Msm/wiSpjdz0VIDMNLO5b5OhN+1Ahu7ub8C+AZsr+HIXtbD/R4kkZLZ/Qd pkPiV3YxhsLVmm86ZmSLWNCp0DPd0TbBZlBTaMJMJJejmK0Ko/ceCUR2aGH1kcI3hHT8 PZtz7Kla8bpV/HJjXCfrpxs6vsTUf18Uexw8T/4g5smoUYXePwcqKqsx9B5gfJG6DT/8 FBlg==
X-Received: by 10.107.30.8 with SMTP id e8mr6581285ioe.166.1446688081430; Wed, 04 Nov 2015 17:48:01 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.79.94.194 with HTTP; Wed, 4 Nov 2015 17:47:42 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <51E6A56BD6A85142B9D172C87FC3ABBB86450DC5@nkgeml501-mbs.china.huawei.com>
References: <20151104044132.13274.44324.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA6BE820E2@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com> <51E6A56BD6A85142B9D172C87FC3ABBB86450DC5@nkgeml501-mbs.china.huawei.com>
From: Varun Singh <vsingh.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2015 10:47:42 +0900
Message-ID: <CAEbPqrwVQKHw54xWogKR19QSRJ0xxUrgAxwkpU1Z0EB9+9sZVg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Huangyihong (Rachel)" <rachel.huang@huawei.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xrblock/IRpPE8YGv9oVIAYuZdMz8jn6gj0>
Cc: "xrblock@ietf.org" <xrblock@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [xrblock] Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-video-lc-04
X-BeenThere: xrblock@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Metric Blocks for use with RTCP's Extended Report Framework working group discussion list <xrblock.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/xrblock/>
List-Post: <mailto:xrblock@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2015 01:48:07 -0000

Hi,

While going through the document yesterday,
I noticed a bug in the blocklength value:

      This field is in accordance with the definition in [RFC3611]. In
      this report block, it MUST be set to 6 when V=10 and be set to 5
      when V=11. The block MUST be discarded if the block length is set
      to a different value.


The values MUST be set to 5, .... and be set to 4. Can you confirm?


For making the parser easier, could the optional part of the packet be
at the end?


On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 2:59 PM, Huangyihong (Rachel)
<rachel.huang@huawei.com> wrote:
> Also, thank you, Dan.
>
> BR,
> Rachel
>
> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: xrblock [mailto:xrblock-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
> 发送时间: 2015年11月4日 12:44
> 收件人: xrblock@ietf.org
> 主题: [xrblock] FW: Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-video-lc-04
>
> Hi,
>
> I submitted to the IESG the request to consider draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-video-lc-04 as Proposed Standard.
>
> Thanks and congratulations to Rachel for driving and editing this work, and to all the WG for the support, comments, contributions.
>
> Regards,
>
> Dan
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Dan Romascanu [mailto:dromasca@avaya.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, November 04, 2015 6:42 AM
>> To: alcoop@cisco.com
>> Cc: Romascanu, Dan (Dan); xrblock-chairs@ietf.org;
>> iesg-secretary@ietf.org; Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
>> Subject: Publication has been requested for
>> draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-video-
>> lc-04
>>
>> Dan Romascanu has requested publication of draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-
>> video-lc-04 as Proposed Standard on behalf of the XRBLOCK working group.
>>
>> Please verify the document's state at
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-video-lc/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> xrblock mailing list
> xrblock@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock
> _______________________________________________
> xrblock mailing list
> xrblock@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock



-- 
http://www.callstats.io