[xrblock] xrblock meeting at IETF-87

"Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com> Tue, 07 May 2013 13:22 UTC

Return-Path: <dromasca@avaya.com>
X-Original-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5E1121F8F87 for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 May 2013 06:22:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bov1Z51QO4o3 for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 May 2013 06:22:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from de307622-de-outbound.net.avaya.com (de307622-de-outbound.net.avaya.com [198.152.71.100]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F02F821F8B18 for <xrblock@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 May 2013 06:22:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgEFAJn/iFGHCzI1/2dsb2JhbABQgmYhv0CBBxZ0giEBAQMSKFEBFRUUQiYBBBsah2oBoSaEMYx0jlSPAIMqYQOdaIp6gw2CJw
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,628,1363147200"; d="scan'208";a="8280250"
Received: from unknown (HELO p-us1-erheast.us1.avaya.com) ([135.11.50.53]) by de307622-de-outbound.net.avaya.com with ESMTP; 07 May 2013 09:22:29 -0400
Received: from unknown (HELO AZ-FFEXHC01.global.avaya.com) ([135.64.58.11]) by p-us1-erheast-out.us1.avaya.com with ESMTP; 07 May 2013 09:18:54 -0400
Received: from AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com ([fe80::6db7:b0af:8480:c126]) by AZ-FFEXHC01.global.avaya.com ([135.64.58.11]) with mapi id 14.02.0328.009; Tue, 7 May 2013 09:22:27 -0400
From: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
To: xrblock <xrblock@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: xrblock meeting at IETF-87
Thread-Index: Ac5LJerDA17SbFmcQu+2fsJK+3g0ZA==
Date: Tue, 7 May 2013 13:22:27 +0000
Message-ID: <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA16632E@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [135.64.58.46]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [xrblock] xrblock meeting at IETF-87
X-BeenThere: xrblock@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Metric Blocks for use with RTCP's Extended Report Framework working group discussion list <xrblock.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xrblock>
List-Post: <mailto:xrblock@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 May 2013 13:22:37 -0000

Hi,

It's time to request meeting slots for IETF-87. I did not see (yet?) any contributions for new work, so requesting a one hour meeting slot seems to be enough for the documents that will still be in works by then. Does anybody think that this is too little time? 

Please send us also your list of conflicts (besides the obvious ones). 

Thanks and Regards,

Shida and Dan