IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [xrblock] Review of draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-summary-stat

"Claire Bi(jiayu)" <bijy@sttri.com.cn> Mon, 15 October 2012 05:51 UTC

Return-Path: <bijy@sttri.com.cn>
X-Original-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55D1221F85A7 for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 14 Oct 2012 22:51:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.439
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.439 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.279, BAYES_20=-0.74, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_HTML_ONLY=1.457]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JzqemYFatHJj for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 14 Oct 2012 22:51:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from corp.21cn.com (corp.forptr.21cn.com [121.14.129.40]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA7F621F8569 for <xrblock@ietf.org>; Sun, 14 Oct 2012 22:51:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ip?218.92.227.107? (unknown [10.27.101.9]) by corp.21cn.com (HERMES) with ESMTP id 798421A4831; Mon, 15 Oct 2012 13:51:31 +0800 (CST)
HMM_ATTACHE_NUM: 0000
HMM_SOURCE_IP: wmail.10.27.101.9.1025934248
HMM_SOURCE_TYPE: WEBMAIL
Received: from ip<218.92.227.107> ([218.92.227.107]) by 21CN-entas9(MEDUSA 10.27.101.9) with ESMTP id 1350280288.15519 for glenzorn@gmail.com ; Mon Oct 15 13:51:35 2012
0/X-Total-Score: 0:
2/X-Total-Score: 3:
X-FILTER-SCORE: to=<888d868f9b90938f61888e828a8d4f84908e9993838d90848c618a8695874f909388>, score=<1350280295uaHtCOOGOOzOOuOOaOh3GzENHP88k88T88288E8x6kT2>
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 13:51:28 +0800
From: "Claire Bi(jiayu)" <bijy@sttri.com.cn>
To: Glen Zorn <glenzorn@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1163913743.2481350280292262.JavaMail.hermes@ent-web1>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_Part_268_49670077.1350280288797"
HMM_WEBCLN_IP: 10.27.10.88
X-HERMES-SENDMODE: normal
X-HERMES-SET: KoH0oguRsun5ALVzckz3EqaqqOumqw==
Cc: xrblock <xrblock@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [xrblock] Review of draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-summary-stat
X-BeenThere: xrblock@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Metric Blocks for use with RTCP's Extended Report Framework working group discussion list <xrblock.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xrblock>
List-Post: <mailto:xrblock@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 05:51:40 -0000

Hi Glen,
 
It's just a suggestion from my point of view, since GOP is more widely used than the expand name of this term.
 
 
Claire
 
 
------------------ 原始邮件 ------------------

发件人：Glen Zorn "glenzorn@gmail.com"
时　间：2012/10/15 13:37:58 星期一
收件人："Claire Bi(jiayu)" "bijy@sttri.com.cn"
抄送人：xrblock "xrblock@ietf.org", glenzorn@gmail.com
主　题：Re: [xrblock] Review of draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-summary-stat

On 10/13/2012 03:53 PM, Claire Bi(jiayu) wrote: .... > > 2.Section 1. s/Group of Pictures/Group of Pictures (GOP) What is the point of introducing a new acronym here? The term "Group of Pictures" is only used once in this doc. ....

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email