Re: [xrblock] Fwd: [ippm] Performance Metrics Registry: new draft

Hi,

This is more of comment on the Metric names listed in Section 4.1

Should the metric names listed in the registry be unique or not?

"Threshold in RTP" appears twice.

In this particular case, the first one relates to the threshold Gmin
for bust/gap

loss and the second points to burst/gap discard. Perhaps these metric names

should have Burst/Gap Loss or Burst/Gap Discard appended to the respective

metric names for them to appear unique.

Another example is "Total RTP packets expected in bursts" is this defined twice?

once each in the bust/gap loss and discard documents. Probably one definition

should suffice?

Cheers,

Varun

On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> wrote:

>  Dear all,
>
> You're feedback is welcome regarding this draft.
>
> Regards, Benoit
>
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------  Subject: [ippm] Performance Metrics
> Registry: new draft  Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 18:10:48 +0200  From: Benoit
> Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> <bclaise@cisco.com>  To: IETF IPPM WG
> <ippm@ietf.org> <ippm@ietf.org>
>
> Dear all,
>
> Let me introduce http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-claise-ippm-perf-metric-registry/
> This draft creates of a new IANA registry, for performance metrics that
> follows the RFC6390 template.
> And, let's not forget that the IPPM charter mentions: "Metric
> definitions will follow the template given in RFC 6390."
>
> Thanks Brian for giving me 10 min to present this draft.
>
> Regards, Benoit.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ippm mailing listippm@ietf.orghttps://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> xrblock mailing list
> xrblock@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock
>
>

-- 
http://www.netlab.tkk.fi/~varun/