Re: [xrblock] call for adoption as WG item -draft-bi-xrblock-rtcp-xr-psi-dep-decodability
Hitoshi Asaeda <asaeda@sfc.wide.ad.jp> Tue, 26 November 2013 04:35 UTC
Return-Path: <asaeda@sfc.wide.ad.jp>
X-Original-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB2A01AE11A for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Nov 2013 20:35:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -98.613
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-98.613 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3eNYG3owBJQn for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Nov 2013 20:35:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.sfc.wide.ad.jp (ns.sfc.wide.ad.jp [IPv6:2001:200:0:8803:203:178:142:143]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7B821A1F56 for <xrblock@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Nov 2013 20:35:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (unknown [133.69.35.12]) by mail.sfc.wide.ad.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6F6A9278173 for <xrblock@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Nov 2013 13:35:41 +0900 (JST)
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 13:35:40 +0900
Message-Id: <20131126.133540.16679621.asaeda@sfc.wide.ad.jp>
To: xrblock@ietf.org
From: Hitoshi Asaeda <asaeda@sfc.wide.ad.jp>
X-Mailer: Mew version 6.3 on Emacs 22.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [xrblock] call for adoption as WG item -draft-bi-xrblock-rtcp-xr-psi-dep-decodability
X-BeenThere: xrblock@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Metric Blocks for use with RTCP's Extended Report Framework working group discussion list <xrblock.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xrblock/>
List-Post: <mailto:xrblock@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 04:35:44 -0000
I support adoption. To authors, note that [PIDCB] this draft refers is now RFC 6990. Regards, -- Hitoshi Asaeda > -----Original Message----- > From: xrblock [mailto:xrblock-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Colin Perkins > Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2013 10:38 PM > To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan) > Cc: xrblock mailing list > Subject: Re: [xrblock] call for adoption as WG item - draft-bi-xrblock-rtcp-xr-psi-dep-decodability > > Dan, Shida, > > On 20 Nov 2013, at 12:29, "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com> wrote: >> During the xrblock WG meeting at IETF-88 there was consensus in the room to adopt draft-bi-xrblock-rtcp-xr-psi-dep-decodability as a WG item. The chairs would like to confirm this consensus on the list. Please express your support or reservations about adopting this item as a WG charter item and adding it to the WG charter, with a delivery date before IETF-90 (July 2014). >> >> Please respond to this call for adoption before Sunday, December 1st. > > > The RTCP XR and SDP extensions in the draft look sensible to me, and the MPEG experts at the meeting seemed to believe the statistics were useful. This draft therefore seems like a reasonable thing to be published, so I support adoption. > > -- > Colin Perkins > http://csperkins.org/ > > > > _______________________________________________ > xrblock mailing list > xrblock@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock > _______________________________________________ > xrblock mailing list > xrblock@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock