Re: [xrblock] WGLCfordraft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-burst-gap-discard-08.txt

Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com> Fri, 21 December 2012 06:11 UTC

Return-Path: <bill.wu@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1688421F8A1F for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 22:11:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.287
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.287 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.326, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_FONT_FACE_BAD=0.884, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1vi0ZPvTzNNc for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 22:11:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA20121F8991 for <xrblock@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 22:11:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml203-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.5-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id AMR89708; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 06:11:31 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LHREML406-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.243) by lhreml203-edg.huawei.com (172.18.7.221) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 06:11:15 +0000
Received: from SZXEML415-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.154) by lhreml406-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.243) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 06:11:29 +0000
Received: from w53375 (10.138.41.149) by szxeml415-hub.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.154) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 14:11:25 +0800
Message-ID: <5DE6D9A4F1EF4077BF20D4CE7FCD7AFF@china.huawei.com>
From: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>
To: "Claire Bi(jiayu)" <bijy@sttri.com.cn>, "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>, <xrblock@ietf.org>
References: <201212201138287037044@sttri.com.cn>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 14:11:24 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0163_01CDDF85.0F7FF1A0"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6109
X-Originating-IP: [10.138.41.149]
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Subject: Re: [xrblock] WGLCfordraft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-burst-gap-discard-08.txt
X-BeenThere: xrblock@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Metric Blocks for use with RTCP's Extended Report Framework working group discussion list <xrblock.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xrblock>
List-Post: <mailto:xrblock@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 06:11:34 -0000

Accepted and thanks.
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Claire Bi(jiayu) 
  To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan) ; xrblock@ietf.org 
  Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 11:38 AM
  Subject: Re: [xrblock] WGLCfordraft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-burst-gap-discard-08.txt


  This draft looks to be in good shape. I just have one minor comment, please see below:

   

  Section 3.2

  1. In the definition of block length:

    

        The length of this report block in 32-bit words, minus one.  For

        the Burst/Gap discard block, the block length is equal to 3.

   

  The text hasn’t mentioned the definition of the receiver if a value other than 3 is received. Would it be better written:

   

  The length of this report block in 32-bit words, minus one, in

        accordance with the definition in[RFC3611] .  For the Burst/Gap 

  discard block, the block length is equal to 3.  The block

        MUST be discarded if the block length is set to a different value.





  Thanks and Regards,

  Claire



------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  From:  Romascanu, Dan (Dan) 
  Date:  2012-12-06  20:14:46 
  To:  xrblock@ietf.org 
  Cc:  
  Subject:  [xrblock] WGLC fordraft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-burst-gap-discard-08.txt 
    
  This is a (second) Working Group Last Call for http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-burst-gap-discard-08.txt.  
  Please read and review this document, and send your comments, questions and concerns to the WG list before December 20, 2012. If you read the document, have no comments and you believe that the document is ready for submission to the IESG as a Standards Track document please send a short message as well to help us in determining the level of review and consensus. 
  Thanks and Regards,
  Dan
  _______________________________________________
  xrblock mailing list
  xrblock@ietf.org
  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock
  __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 7404 (20120821) __________
  The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
  http://www.eset.com
    


------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________
  xrblock mailing list
  xrblock@ietf.org
  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock