[xrblock] Fw: I-D Action: draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-jb-06.txt

Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com> Thu, 10 January 2013 09:47 UTC

Return-Path: <bill.wu@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8E3C21F8480 for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 01:47:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.846
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.846 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gidTUiZjJYvw for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 01:47:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D80921F842D for <xrblock@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 01:47:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml203-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.5-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id ANI98144; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 09:47:09 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LHREML404-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.218) by lhreml203-edg.huawei.com (172.18.7.221) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 09:45:52 +0000
Received: from SZXEML424-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.163) by lhreml404-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.218) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 17:47:05 +0800
Received: from w53375 (10.138.41.149) by szxeml424-hub.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.163) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 17:45:04 +0800
Message-ID: <217E1B5D0584495D884BEE81E98E5BC1@china.huawei.com>
From: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>
To: <xrblock@ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 17:45:04 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6109
X-Originating-IP: [10.138.41.149]
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Subject: [xrblock] Fw: I-D Action: draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-jb-06.txt
X-BeenThere: xrblock@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Metric Blocks for use with RTCP's Extended Report Framework working group discussion list <xrblock.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xrblock>
List-Post: <mailto:xrblock@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 09:47:11 -0000

On 10 January , 2012 5:23 PM, Internet-Drafts@ietf.org wrote:

> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Metric Blocks for use with RTCP's Extended Report Framework Working Group of the IETF.
> 
> Title           : RTP Control Protocol (RTCP) Extended Report (XR) Block for Jitter Buffer Metric Reporting
> Author(s)       : Alan Clark
>                          Varun Singh
>                          Qin Wu
> Filename        : draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-jb-06.txt
> Pages           : 16
> Date            : 2013-01-10
> 
> Abstract:
>   This document defines an RTP Control Protocol (RTCP) Extended Report
>   (XR) Block that allows the reporting of Jitter Buffer metrics for a
>   range of RTP applications.
> 
> 
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-jb

[Qin]: This version reflects one minor change based on recent discussion with Kevin and Glen on the list. 
One main change is to  change 2bit jitter buffer configuration field back into1 bit 
field since adaptive jitter buffer in my understanding should always change buffer size 
to react to some events and can not have a fixed buffer size.