Re: [xrblock] Liaison Statement to W3C for rtcweb-rtcp-xr-metrics

[Shida Schubert <[e-mail]>]

Hi Dan, dear co-chair :) 

Much appreciate the comments. 

I will revise it based on your feedback!

Thanks!
Shida

> On Jan 20, 2016, at 7:54 AM, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> Hi Shida,
> 
> Here are a few comments: 
> 
> - to avoid extra processing and dispatching time we should send the liaison statement to the WebRTC WG rather than the whole W3C
> - use https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcweb-rtcp-xr-metrics/ as a better reference to the I-D 
> - point to the WG mail list for comments (so that they do not feel obliged to respond with a formal liaison) e.g. s/ Any comments are welcome/Comments from the W3C WebRTC WG participants are welcome, they can be provided directly to the WG [e-mail] mail list/
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Dan
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: xrblock [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Shida
>> Schubert
>> Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2016 6:33 AM
>> To: xrblock
>> Subject: [xrblock] Liaison Statement to W3C for rtcweb-rtcp-xr-metrics
>> 
>> 
>> All;
>> 
>> Below is a draft for liaison statement to W3C for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcweb-
>> rtcp-xr-metrics.
>> 
>> Welcoming comments…
>> 
>> *****
>> 
>> W3C,
>> 
>> The XRBLOCK WG in IETF has been working on a draft recommending the
>> type of RTCP XR blocks that would be beneficial for webrtc endpoint, in order
>> to identify any issues regarding media stream(s) and act on to provide better
>> overall user-experience to the end-user. The draft defines a IANA registry
>> with a list of identifiers for the WebRTC's statistics API with a set of RTCP SR,
>> RR, and XR metrics related to the transport of multimedia flows.
>> 
>> http://tools.ietf.org/wg/xrblock/draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcweb-rtcp-xr-metrics/
>> 
>> Gist from the introduction of the draft:
>> "The WebRTC Stats API currently lists
>> metrics reported in the RTCP Sender and Receiver Report (SR/RR)  [RFC3550]
>> to fulfill this requirement.  However, the basic metrics  from RTCP SR/RR are
>> not sufficient for precise quality monitoring, or  diagnosing potential issues.
>> 
>> In this document, we provide some guidelines on choosing additional  RTP
>> metrics for the WebRTC [W3C.WD-webrtc-20150210].  Furthermore, we
>> create a registry containing metrics reported in RTCP XR."
>> 
>> Any comments are welcome.
>> 
>> S. Schubert
>> Co-chair, XRBLOCK Workgroup
>> 
>