IETF Logo Mail Archive

[xrblock] FW: SDP directorate review of draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-psi-decodability-02

"Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com> Wed, 23 April 2014 11:13 UTC

Return-Path: <dromasca@avaya.com>
X-Original-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63A431A01EA for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 04:13:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.871
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.871 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.272] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dNcMSwF0LVAU for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 04:13:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from de307622-de-outbound.net.avaya.com (de307622-de-outbound.net.avaya.com [198.152.71.100]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DABF81A006D for <xrblock@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 04:13:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvMJAF+fV1PGmAcV/2dsb2JhbABZgkIjIU9XqkiSDgYdhmlRgRgWdIIlAQEBAQMBAQEPG0ELEAIBCA0EBAEBCx0HAiULFAcBAQUDAQEEDgUIBhSIHwEMoTWtaxMEjicxBgGDJIEVBJBwgTeNUItTgzGCKw
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.97,911,1389762000"; d="txt'?scan'208,217"; a="51632941"
Received: from unknown (HELO co300216-co-erhwest-exch.avaya.com) ([198.152.7.21]) by de307622-de-outbound.net.avaya.com with ESMTP; 23 Apr 2014 07:13:17 -0400
Received: from unknown (HELO AZ-FFEXHC01.global.avaya.com) ([135.64.58.11]) by co300216-co-erhwest-out.avaya.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 23 Apr 2014 06:57:48 -0400
Received: from AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com ([fe80::6db7:b0af:8480:c126]) by AZ-FFEXHC01.global.avaya.com ([135.64.58.11]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.001; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 13:13:15 +0200
From: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
To: "xrblock@ietf.org" <xrblock@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: SDP directorate review of draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-psi-decodability-02
Thread-Index: Ac9e34bT8uRPa5C7TbaBxzCYiGKRmQABT4dw
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 11:13:14 +0000
Message-ID: <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA5C7C51E0@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com>
References: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D2D70A8@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
In-Reply-To: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D2D70A8@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [135.64.58.46]
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="_004_9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA5C7C51E0AZFFEXMB04globa_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xrblock/rysFMq61Md2rpgo-iq86sZ72QLE
Cc: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
Subject: [xrblock] FW: SDP directorate review of draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-psi-decodability-02
X-BeenThere: xrblock@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Metric Blocks for use with RTCP's Extended Report Framework working group discussion list <xrblock.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xrblock/>
List-Post: <mailto:xrblock@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 11:13:28 -0000

See below the SDP review by Christer Holmberg.

Thanks, Christer!

Authors - can you address the question asked by the reviewer?

Thanks and Regards,

Dan


From: mmusic [mailto:mmusic-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Christer Holmberg
Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2014 1:45 PM
To: mmusic (E-mail)
Cc: draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-psi-decodability@tools.ietf.org
Subject: [MMUSIC] SDP directorate review of draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-psi-decodability-02

Hi,

I have performed the SDP directorate review of draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-psi-decodability-02.

As the document only extends the SDP rtcp-xr-attrib attribute, and refers to RFC 3611 for the associated Offer/Answer procedures.

Now, the Offer/Answer procedures in RFC 3611 could REALLY use some work, but it is of course not the purpose of this draft to fix that :)

However, RFC 3611 does also have a section (5.3) about non-Offer/Answer usage, but the draft does not say anything about that. For completeness, should there be a section, referring to RFC 3611 also for that?

Regards,

Christer

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email