IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [yam] Last Call: <draft-ietf-yam-rfc4409bis-02.txt>

Frank Ellermann <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com> Thu, 18 August 2011 01:32 UTC

Return-Path: <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: yam@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: yam@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26CCF21F8AE4 for <yam@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 18:32:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.752
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.752 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.347, BAYES_00=-2.599, FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL=0.5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id p1YhVvcINBQA for <yam@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 18:32:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pz0-f45.google.com (mail-pz0-f45.google.com [209.85.210.45]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B42C721F8AE1 for <yam@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 18:32:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pzk33 with SMTP id 33so3368296pzk.18 for <yam@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 18:32:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=JocUPW0OUa3gaKC04vDqJj92AW0WDOJq5cdKf9S1x/Q=; b=ZmHPgOIZ7cultWtozoHBLEq0lqaMuaElldUkmXRvpNZiWf+gbxRyEt05+gS3BiWfy6 KQUQmSyVuMftKL4ioVuyPnUfm0wfnPoEkErwmUgpHZO4Zrv4Pi6HCmL0ByqSpFYvRXRt IM1FXy/iHboZQHWShGddeuumPIPIyiOOd6kDM=
Received: by 10.143.69.12 with SMTP id w12mr67703wfk.298.1313631170077; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 18:32:50 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.142.98.5 with HTTP; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 18:32:30 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <B18952FE92A9CDD7DD15399E@PST.JCK.COM>
References: <CAHhFybpeqbrrNTZE-gK3b2dgPVt36b6_JgLashE0QtpyZ=orcQ@mail.gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20110816233144.09fb6728@resistor.net> <CAHhFybp7Fhcx80nro6MTU8y_7gTf565tVA7y4CZo25X64Zx8Yg@mail.gmail.com> <75A46BDCEA6D3EC8375441E3@PST.JCK.COM> <CAHhFybr8nXTmfj2EV7ZuuLvL9Cb1QRzUZkAYvYSOX96aE3LcZQ@mail.gmail.com> <B18952FE92A9CDD7DD15399E@PST.JCK.COM>
From: Frank Ellermann <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 03:32:30 +0200
Message-ID: <CAHhFyboa_e_xb93N49v6BNe_X40DvHJ76AswjXp8aVfpHJauDw@mail.gmail.com>
To: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: yam@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [yam] Last Call: <draft-ietf-yam-rfc4409bis-02.txt>
X-BeenThere: yam@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Yet Another Mail working group discussion list <yam.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/yam>, <mailto:yam-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/yam>
List-Post: <mailto:yam@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:yam-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yam>, <mailto:yam-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 01:32:02 -0000

On 18 August 2011 02:59, John C Klensin wrote:

> :-(

Now what, I confirmed everything you wrote before.  Is it some
case of bad DEnglish on my side, that you interpret "I wasn't
aware of" as "I don't believe you"?  I simply meant "I didn't
know this", no tricks, no intention to dig through 6000+ RFCs
in a weird quest to find any exceptions from an editorial or
stylistic principle I did not know until you mentioned it.

> YMMD and I wouldn't dream of trying to suppress your right
> to say so.

Hopefully the folks trying to evaluate the Last Call comments
identify this thread as one "+1" wrt 4409bis, and nothing more
or else.  I've no idea why that apparently upsets you, sorry.

-Frank

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email