[yam] Issue #9: RFC 5321 Section 3.9.2: remove extra text
SM <sm@resistor.net> Sun, 06 December 2009 10:44 UTC
Return-Path: <sm@resistor.net>
X-Original-To: yam@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: yam@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE5A93A6966 for <yam@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 6 Dec 2009 02:44:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.493
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.493 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.106, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LviY6tm001zf for <yam@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 6 Dec 2009 02:44:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ns1.qubic.net (ns1.qubic.net [208.69.177.116]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15C0C3A68EC for <yam@ietf.org>; Sun, 6 Dec 2009 02:44:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from subman.resistor.net ([10.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns1.qubic.net (8.14.4.Beta0/8.14.4.Beta0) with ESMTP id nB6AhW2C003455 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <yam@ietf.org>; Sun, 6 Dec 2009 02:43:51 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1260096232; x=1260182632; bh=mS36hxPS4RaIYv379jkHNLpg0tCtPxGRbfFzNb+QX4I=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Cc; b=lrJZ78LlNpcS19/NepvOQHf3oJiv4wVnEQpXrnghxxSQ1QnUE6yRZph4dS0UvL3S9 k/yJAZAiuLU+h/d35GbJafsNuikJaC+j2rAg1w9M3/2wiVtP3Id9/AzPb+ao+V3oLO IpbiHfyalVr/3VUeAcwca2SumvXcTPpPJ2fT5owQ=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=mail; d=resistor.net; c=simple; q=dns; b=GJGfW5inL571WqHbIYP6j6a4tLh8VK/2LAXCFX83+ctBO0VNSpAbxBaqfONC8f/RK PAA5adpXBjbo1KMm1K2RUeI1T5mTqLlsMdq6e5TngDW3m7jOgIVK4G+Yge1mbu+LTm8 v/h+qUUpx/+x927Zfwt9Cu0uusln10tXJgj5nj0=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20091206012800.033cdf58@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Sun, 06 Dec 2009 01:35:00 -0800
To: yam@ietf.org
From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Subject: [yam] Issue #9: RFC 5321 Section 3.9.2: remove extra text
X-BeenThere: yam@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Yet Another Mail working group discussion list <yam.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yam>, <mailto:yam-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/yam>
List-Post: <mailto:yam@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:yam-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yam>, <mailto:yam-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Dec 2009 10:44:04 -0000
Hello,
There is a typo in the following sentence in Section 3.9.2 of RFC 5321:
"Note that the key difference between handling aliases (Section 3.9.1) and
forwarding (this subsection) is the change to the backward-pointing
address in this case."
The sentence illustrates the difference between mailing lists and
aliases. I suggest:
Note that the key difference between handling aliases (Section 3.9.1) and
mailing lists (this subsection) is the change to the backward-pointing
address in this case.
Regards,
-sm