IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [yam] YAM - Requested session has been scheduled for IETF 78

John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> Mon, 28 June 2010 23:27 UTC

Return-Path: <john-ietf@jck.com>
X-Original-To: yam@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: yam@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 013773A6949 for <yam@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 16:27:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.645
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.645 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.954, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id afOefbZv7EBB for <yam@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 16:27:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bs.jck.com (ns.jck.com [209.187.148.211]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0487B3A69D8 for <yam@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 16:27:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=localhost) by bs.jck.com with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1OTNk0-00066g-Qq; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 19:27:52 -0400
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 19:27:51 -0400
From: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
To: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>, Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>, Tony Hansen <tony@att.com>
Message-ID: <6773B3869F1E340DFB21A779@PST.JCK.COM>
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20100628144553.0d2ba9f8@resistor.net>
References: <20100624210950.74B703A69D6@core3.amsl.com> <4C24353B.1050605@att.com> <4C290EA5.8090501@isode.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20100628144553.0d2ba9f8@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Cc: Yet Another Mail Working Group <yam@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [yam] YAM - Requested session has been scheduled for IETF 78
X-BeenThere: yam@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Yet Another Mail working group discussion list <yam.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yam>, <mailto:yam-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/yam>
List-Post: <mailto:yam@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:yam-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yam>, <mailto:yam-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 23:27:55 -0000

--On Monday, June 28, 2010 14:59 -0700 S Moonesamy
<sm+ietf@elandsys.com> wrote:

> At 14:05 28-06-10, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
>> I would like to suggest to move the YAM's meeting till after
>> the  IESG plenary on Wednesday. This will help the WG to
>> spend the  meeting time more productively.
> 
> This is an excellent idea.

I don't know if YAM wants it, but one of the important
participants in the URNbis BOF had a hard conflict on Friday
(has to be back in Finland) and would welcome a swap with their
currently-scheduled 0900 - 1130 slot on Friday.  I don't see
anything in that Friday slot that looks like a serious conflict
for YAM.

    john

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email