[yam] Request for comments: draft-ietf-yam-5321bis-smtp-pre-evaluation-01
S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Tue, 08 December 2009 18:06 UTC
Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: yam@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: yam@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFFB128C1D4 for <yam@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Dec 2009 10:06:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.272
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.272 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.327, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZhLsfk0H9JwG for <yam@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Dec 2009 10:06:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.elandsys.com (mail.elandsys.com [208.69.177.125]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7E6E28C1CA for <yam@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Dec 2009 10:06:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from subman.elandsys.com ([41.136.236.225]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.elandsys.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id nB8I5pdc029515 for <yam@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Dec 2009 10:05:56 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1260295558; x=1260381958; bh=9A/18xXXFAblpCAilcDFPjzF1m0=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=2fxwOqSIzn6IgP5z2NmZUWex0yAdMT/jrel+7Kca/vzudBd4s/g78X0xA56HrMgi/ UgEDwQTb1gljvDfz5Mq0n3rSXcfQII8oXx/BUf43xTf5AZGEtuADDQtKIDPWnpLsEb 45sTbOBIM4euoV/rPo6vOgETuT/1PjSZpwgsMTNs=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20091208084349.03127cd0@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2009 10:05:34 -0800
To: yam@ietf.org
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Subject: [yam] Request for comments: draft-ietf-yam-5321bis-smtp-pre-evaluation-01
X-BeenThere: yam@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Yet Another Mail working group discussion list <yam.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yam>, <mailto:yam-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/yam>
List-Post: <mailto:yam@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:yam-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yam>, <mailto:yam-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2009 18:06:09 -0000
This is a request for comments on the issues for draft-ietf-yam-5321bis-smtp-pre-evaluation-01 [1]. This is the list of verified or reported Errata to date: Errata ID 1683: Verified - Change in the ABNF in Section 4.4 Errata ID 1543: Reported - Change in SMTP code in Section 3.8 This was posted to the YAM WG mailing list [2]. There was a request for the erratum to be considered as retracted [3]. Errata ID 1851: Reported - Editorial change in Section 4.1.1.5 Errata ID 1820: was rejected. It is being discussed within the WG as Issue #9. Issue #5: Section 6.1: rewording There hasn't been any discussion about the issue [4]. Issue #6: Section 4.4: remove typo There was comments about the sentence being out of place [5]. Additional discussion about the false binary choice for DSN started on the same thread. Issue #7: Section 2.2.2: add a bullet for the definition of extensions This was discussed [6] [7] [8]. Issue #8: Section 4.1.1.3 Recipient: missing text This issue has not been discussed [9]. Issue #9: Section 3.9.2: remove extra text A change was suggested [10]. Issue #10: 3.9: add tiny subsection There were several comments [11] [12]. Issue #11: 3.1: Clarify language for 554 status code There was a discussion [13]. Issue #12: Using RFC 2606 for examples This will be in the pre-evaluation I-D [14]. Issue #13: RFC 2119 keywords and Idnits There is a typo [15]. Please review RFC 5321 and post your comments to the mailing list. If you want any other change in RFC 5321bis, post the suggested text, optionally with the reason(s) for the change, to this mailing list. Regards, S. Moonesamy YAM WG Secretary 1. http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-yam-5321bis-smtp-pre-evaluation-01 2. http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/yam/current/msg00067.html 3. http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/yam/current/msg00079.html 4. http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/yam/current/msg00165.html 5. http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/yam/current/msg00222.html 6. http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/yam/current/msg00181.html 7. http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/yam/current/msg00223.html 8. http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/yam/current/msg00236.html 9. http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/yam/current/msg00168.html 10. http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/yam/current/msg00224.html 11. http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/yam/current/msg00230.html 12. http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/yam/current/msg00237.html 13. http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/yam/current/msg00185.html 14. http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/yam/current/msg00240.html 15. http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/yam/current/msg00234.html